South Carolina Seeks Supreme Court Review on Transgender Bathroom Ban
South Carolina officials are appealing to the Supreme Court to enforce a ban on transgender students using bathrooms based on biological sex, following federal appeals court rulings.
Overview
- South Carolina officials are seeking intervention from the Supreme Court to uphold a state ban on transgender students using bathrooms that do not align with their biological sex.
- The state's appeal comes after federal appeals court rulings challenged the legality of the ban, prompting South Carolina to escalate the legal battle.
- The policy mandates that students use restrooms corresponding to their biological sex, a measure that has faced significant opposition and legal challenges.
- Transgender students and their parents have filed lawsuits against South Carolina, arguing that the bathroom policy violates federal law and the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution.
- The legal dispute centers on the rights of transgender students versus state-mandated bathroom policies, with the Supreme Court now potentially weighing in on the matter.
Report issue
Read both sides in 5 minutes each day
Analysis
Center-leaning sources cover this story neutrally by presenting a balanced account of the legal dispute. They detail the South Carolina officials' arguments for their bathroom policy and the transgender student's challenge, along with the procedural history of the case. The reporting avoids loaded language and provides context from both sides, focusing on the legal facts.
"South Carolina officials asked the Supreme Court to allow the state to fully enforce a measure that makes some education funding contingent upon school districts complying with a rule prohibiting transgender students from using restrooms corresponding with their gender identity."
CBS NewsArticles (3)
FAQ
South Carolina officials have appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold the state's ban on transgender students using bathrooms based on their biological sex after a federal appeals court struck down the law. The Supreme Court is considering the state's request to pause the lower court's ruling as part of a legal dispute over the policy.
The legal challenge argues that South Carolina's bathroom policy violates the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause, which prohibits discriminatory treatment of similar individuals, and Title IX of the Civil Rights Act, which bars sex discrimination in education programs receiving federal funding.
The Supreme Court's recent 6-3 decision in United States v. Skrmetti upheld Tennessee's ban on certain medical treatments for transgender minors, which South Carolina cited as a basis to request the Supreme Court to pause the 4th Circuit's ruling against its bathroom ban.
The lawsuit was filed by a transgender student, known only as John Doe in litigation, who contends that the bathroom law discriminates against him by requiring use of bathrooms corresponding to biological sex rather than gender identity.
The Supreme Court’s decision on South Carolina's bathroom ban could set a precedent for how state laws regulate transgender students' access to bathrooms, potentially affecting protections under federal constitutional and civil rights laws nationally.
History
- This story does not have any previous versions.