Washington D.C. Officials Sue Trump Administration Over National Guard Deployment
Washington D.C. officials, including Attorney General Brian Schwalb, have filed lawsuits against President Trump and his administration, challenging the National Guard deployment as an illegal occupation.
D.C. sues Trump administration over National Guard deployment
World News Group
D.C. Sues to End Trump's National Guard Deployment
TIME Magazine
BREAKING: DC AG sues Trump admin over deployment of National Guard to city
The Post Millennial
D.C. Files Suit To End Trump’s National Guard Deployment
The Daily Wire
Subscribe to unlock this story
We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $5/month, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!
Get StartedHave an account? Sign in
Overview
- Washington D.C. officials, led by Attorney General Brian Schwalb, have filed lawsuits against President Trump and his administration over the deployment of National Guard troops in the capital.
- The lawsuits contend that the National Guard deployment constitutes an illegal and involuntary military occupation, violating the city's autonomy and right to self-governance under the Home Rule Act.
- The Trump administration declared a 'crime emergency' in D.C., taking control of local police, despite federal data indicating a decline in crime, prompting the city's legal action.
- D.C. officials argue the deployment was unnecessary and unwanted, causing irreparable harm and damaging the city's economy, while the White House cites crime reduction.
- Amidst ongoing legal challenges, National Guard members deployed in D.C. may have their military orders extended through December to secure troop benefits, as reported by CNN.
Report issue
Read both sides in 5 minutes each day
Analysis
Center-leaning sources frame this story by centering the narrative on the legal challenge to the D.C. National Guard deployment. They consistently highlight the lawsuit's claims of "illegal deployment" and the administration "running roughshod" over democratic tenets, even while including the White House's defense. This collective emphasis shapes the story as a dispute over federal overreach.
"The order applies only to the members of the D.C. National Guard who were deployed last month to enhance security in the nation's capital."
CBS News"The forced military occupation of the District of Columbia violates our local autonomy and basic freedoms."
USA TODAY"The suit says that the government’s “unprecedented, unlawful actions” have caused “irreparable harm” by infringing on the city’s right to self-governance, fueling distrust toward local law enforcement, and depressing business and tourism."
NBC NewsArticles (18)
FAQ
Washington D.C.'s lawsuit argues that the deployment of National Guard troops constitutes an illegal and involuntary military occupation violating the city's autonomy and self-governance under the Home Rule Act, and claims the military involvement in local law enforcement breaches constitutional protections and precedent such as the Posse Comitatus Act.
The Trump administration declared a 'crime emergency' in Washington D.C. and took control of the local police to enhance security, citing continued concerns about maintaining law and order, despite federal data showing a decline in crime rates.
The deployment of the D.C. National Guard has been extended through November 30, 2025, with commanders emphasizing the continuation of efforts to ensure safety in the nation’s capital, allowing guardsmen to maintain troop benefits through extended military orders.
D.C. officials contend the National Guard presence is an unnecessary, involuntary military occupation that undermines the city's autonomy, disrupts local governance, causes irreparable harm, and negatively impacts the local economy.
Yes, over 2,000 National Guard members from D.C. and other states, mainly from states with Republican governors, have been deployed; many are under federal orders but not formally federalized, a complex legal situation raising questions about the extent of federal authority over domestic troops.
History
- 12d
10 articles - 12d
5 articles