


Appeals Court Upholds $83 Million Defamation Judgment Against President Trump, Rejects Immunity Defense
A federal appeals court upheld an $83.3 million defamation judgment against President Trump for E. Jean Carroll, rejecting his presidential immunity defense and calls for a new trial.
Overview
- Multiple federal appeals courts, including the 2nd U.S. Circuit, upheld an $83.3 million defamation judgment against President Donald Trump in favor of writer E. Jean Carroll.
- The judgment stems from President Trump's 2019 defamatory statements denying E. Jean Carroll's claims of sexual assault, for which a jury found him liable in a previous trial.
- The $83.3 million award includes $18.3 million for emotional and reputational harm, plus $65 million in punitive damages, reflecting his reckless disregard for the truth.
- President Trump's defense team argued for dismissal or a new trial based on presidential immunity, but the Second District found no grounds for immunity in the case.
- Appellate courts rejected arguments that damages were excessive, criticizing President Trump's "extraordinary and egregious" conduct as malicious and deceitful, leading to the judgment being upheld.
Report issue

Read both sides in 5 minutes each day
Analysis
Center-leaning sources frame this story by emphasizing the court's strong condemnation of Trump's conduct and the "egregious" nature of the case. They highlight the "latest defeat" for Trump and the "remarkably high" reprehensibility of his actions, often through prominent placement of court language and extensive quotes from Carroll's attorney, underscoring the justice served.
Articles (23)
Center (7)
FAQ
The Second Circuit Court found no grounds for presidential immunity in the defamation case, concluding that the defamatory statements made by President Trump denying E. Jean Carroll's sexual assault claims did not fall within the scope of his official presidential duties, and thus he could be held liable.
The $83.3 million judgment includes $18.3 million for emotional and reputational harm to E. Jean Carroll and $65 million in punitive damages, reflecting the court's finding that President Trump's conduct was malicious, deceitful, and showed a reckless disregard for the truth in denying Carroll's sexual assault allegations.
Evidence included testimony from two friends Carroll spoke to after the alleged assault, a 1987 photograph of Carroll with Trump, testimony from two other women who accused Trump of sexual assault, footage from the Trump Access Hollywood tape, and his own deposition in October 2022. This evidence contributed to the jury finding Trump liable for defamation.
The appellate courts rejected arguments that the $83.3 million damages were excessive, criticizing President Trump's conduct as extraordinarily egregious and malicious, which justified the punitive damages and the overall amount awarded to E. Jean Carroll.
E. Jean Carroll filed two related lawsuits against Donald Trump — one resulted in a $5 million damages award in May 2023 for sexual abuse and defamation, and the other was the $83.3 million defamation judgment upheld in 2025. Trump’s appeals were unsuccessful, and he was held liable in both cases for the misconduct described by Carroll.
History
- 8d6 articles
- 8d14 articles