Supreme Court Expands Federal Officers' Leeway in LA Immigration Stops Amid Strong Dissent
The Supreme Court has lifted restrictions on immigration enforcement in Los Angeles, allowing federal officers more leeway in stops, a move strongly dissented by Justice Sotomayor as a Fourth Amendment violation.
SCOTUS lets Trump resume LA ICE raids, fire FTC commissioner
World News Group
Sotomayor rips Supreme Court ruling on LA immigration raid restrictions
Washington Examiner
Supreme Court rules ICE can profile Latinos in Southern California
New York Daily News
BREAKING: Supreme Court allows Trump admin’s immigration enforcement in LA
The Post Millennial
Overview
- The Supreme Court overturned a federal judge's order, allowing the Trump administration to resume immigration raids and enforcement stops in Los Angeles.
- Justice Sonia Sotomayor strongly dissented, stating the ruling violates the Fourth Amendment by granting federal officers more leeway in conducting immigration enforcement stops.
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh stated that brief questioning is typical for legally present individuals, while acknowledging ethnicity can be a relevant factor for officials to initiate stops.
- The decision permits ICE agents to profile individuals, including Latinos, based on factors like language and ethnicity, intensifying Los Angeles as a battleground for enforcement.
- This ruling is a victory for President Trump's deportation push, with raids expected near schools and workplaces, despite DHS arguing targets are based on legal status.
Report issue
Read both sides in 5 minutes each day
Analysis
Center-leaning sources frame the Supreme Court's ICE ruling as deeply hypocritical and racially biased, especially when contrasted with its affirmative action decision. They use highly charged language and rhetorical questions to portray the court's actions as inconsistent and discriminatory, suggesting that race matters only when convenient for conservative justices.
"Sotomayor called the order "unconscionably irreconcilable with our nation’s constitutional guarantees.""
USA TODAY"What matters here is the practical reality that the Trump Administration's enforcement program can continue."
Reason"It seems hypocrisy and not-so-veiled racism have become the law of the land."
USA TODAY"The Supreme Court's decision has been criticised by Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass, a Democrat."
BBC News"The Trump administration's pattern of conducting immigration enforcement stops without reasonable suspicion has done "immeasurable" harm."
CBS News"The decision to grant an emergency request filed by the Trump administration puts on hold the July 11 ruling by Los Angeles-based U.S. District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong."
NBC News"The majority’s brief and unsigned order did not include legal reasoning for the decision."
USA TODAY"The Supreme Court's 6-3 decision comes as Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents also step up enforcement in Washington amid Trump’s unprecedented federal takeover of the capital city’s law enforcement and deployment of the National Guard."
Associated PressArticles (23)
Center (8)
FAQ
The Supreme Court allowed federal officers to resume immigration stops in Los Angeles by putting on hold a lower court ruling that restricted such stops, emphasizing that judges must ensure executive actions comply with the Constitution and statutes, and noting that ethnicity can be a relevant factor in reasonable suspicion for immigration enforcement stops.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor strongly dissented, stating the ruling was a 'grave misuse' of the Court's emergency docket and that it violated the Fourth Amendment by allowing government agents to seize anyone who looks Latino, speaks Spanish, and appears to work a low wage job, effectively endorsing racial profiling.
The ACLU condemned the ruling, warning it puts people at grave risk by allowing federal agents in Southern California to target individuals based on race, language, workplace, or location, describing it as enabling a 'papers please' regime with risks of violent arrests and detention.
The decision permits Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to resume operations and conduct stops in Los Angeles with broader discretion, including profiling based on factors like language and ethnicity, enabling raids near schools and workplaces as part of the Trump administration's deportation efforts.
Critics argue that relying on apparent race, ethnicity, and language introduces unlawful racial profiling violating Fourth Amendment protections, while supporters claim these factors can be relevant to reasonable suspicion, leading to a contentious legal and public debate.
History
- 8d
11 articles - 8d5 articles