Supreme Court Weighs Voting Rights Act's Future, Threatening Black Representation in Congress
The Supreme Court is rearguing a case that could restrict race-based districts under the Voting Rights Act, potentially reducing Black representation in Congress and altering political power.
Racial aspect of redistricting argued at Supreme Court
World News Group
Supreme Court Appears Poised To Prohibit Race-Conscious Congressional Districts
Washington Free Beacon
Kavanaugh questions 'endpoint' for race-based redistricting
Washington Examiner
The Voting Rights Act and the Facts
New York Sun
Supreme Court hears voting rights challenge that could kill Black seats
New York Daily News
The Perils of the Supreme Court Forgetting the Past
TIME Magazine
Supreme Court may spark new redistricting fight in Louisiana case
Washington Examiner
Overview
- The Supreme Court is rearguing Louisiana v. Callais, examining if Louisiana's congressional maps, including majority-Black districts, comply with Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
- The Voting Rights Act is hailed as significant civil rights legislation, designed to prevent racial discrimination in voting, with Section 2 being a key component.
- The Court's conservative majority may restrict race-based districts under Section 2, raising concerns about the future of such remedies and their necessity.
- A potential ruling could lead to reduced Black representation in Congress, a concern for legal experts, while Republicans worry about racial factors in redistricting.
- Limiting Section 2 could severely impact Black voters and potentially enable Republicans to gain control of Democratic-held districts, altering congressional representation in the South.
Report issue
Read both sides in 5 minutes each day
Analysis
Center-leaning sources frame this story by emphasizing the Supreme Court's conservative majority's apparent intent to weaken the landmark Voting Rights Act. They highlight the potential for reduced minority representation and significant political gains for Republicans, using strong language to underscore the perceived negative ramifications for civil rights and democratic fairness.
"The potential weakening of the Voting Rights Act could lead to extreme gerrymandering by Republicans, leaving many Black voters without real representation in Congress."
Chicago Tribune"If the court sides with Louisiana, some Democratic members of Congress said they hoped the decision would be narrowly tailored to that case rather than an all-out assault on the last major pillar of the landmark civil rights law."
Associated Press"The Supreme Court is re-hearing the case involving Louisiana's map just over two years after it upheld Section 2 and reaffirmed the framework for proving vote dilution set out in the 1986 ruling."
CBS News"A ruling gutting Section 2 could have a cascading effect on congressional maps in mostly Southern states where Republicans either control both legislative chambers and the governor's office or have a veto-proof majority in the legislature — and where voting is racially polarized, with Black voters tending to vote Democratic and white voters tending to vote Republican."
NPR"A significant ruling that dilutes that part of the Voting Rights Act also would likely negate another voting rights case coming to the court."
ABC News"The Supreme Court's upcoming decision on Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act could have significant implications for the future of voting rights in the United States."
Associated Press"A broad ruling in Louisiana's favor would reduce the need for states to draw legislative districts composed largely of minority groups and would likely lead to a reduction in the number of minority lawmakers in Congress and state legislatures."
NBC News"If Section 2 is overturned, Nelson argued, "it would be utterly devastating.""
NPR"The case could open the door for the first really significant decline in minority representation in more than 100 years in Congress."
Semafor"The Supreme Court is taking up a major Republican-led challenge to the Voting Rights Act, the centerpiece legislation of the civil rights movement, that could gut a key provision of the law that prohibits racial discrimination in redistricting."
ABC News"A ruling for the state could open the door for legislatures to redraw congressional maps across the South, potentially boosting Republican electoral prospects by eliminating majority Black and Latino seats that tend to favor Democrats."
Associated Press"The legal fight has been before the justices before."
CBS NewsArticles (36)
Center (12)
FAQ
The main concern is that limiting race-based districts under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act could lead to reduced Black representation in Congress and favor Republicans in redistricting efforts.
Section 2 is a key component designed to prevent racial discrimination in voting by ensuring equal participation for people of color in democracy.
The case was reargued due to its significance in determining the constitutionality of Louisiana's congressional map, specifically regarding the use of race in redistricting and its implications for fair representation.
History
- 20h
13 articles
- 1d3 articles
- 1d
7 articles - 1d
6 articles - 2d
4 articles