BBC News logo
NPR logo
New York Sun logo
27 articles
·19d

Trump Nominee Paul Ingrassia Withdraws After Alleged Offensive Texts Emerge

Paul Ingrassia, President Trump's nominee for the Office of Special Counsel, withdrew his nomination after alleged offensive texts, including derogatory comments about Martin Luther King Jr. Day, led to widespread Republican opposition.

Overview

A summary of the key points of this story verified across multiple sources.

  • Paul Ingrassia, President Trump's nominee for the Office of Special Counsel, withdrew his nomination following the emergence of alleged offensive text messages.
  • The controversial texts reportedly included Ingrassia describing a 'Nazi streak' and denouncing the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday and other holidays celebrating Black Americans.
  • Multiple Republican senators, including Senate Majority Leader John Thune, withdrew their support, urging the White House to recall the nomination due to the allegations.
  • Ingrassia's attorney questioned the authenticity and intent of the messages, suggesting they were satirical or potentially AI-generated, while Ingrassia denied any wrongdoing.
  • His withdrawal occurred before a scheduled confirmation hearing, amidst growing concerns about his past remarks and alleged ties to online extremism.
Written by AI using shared reports from
27 articles
.

Report issue

Pano Newsletter

Read both sides in 5 minutes each day

Analysis

Compare how each side frames the story — including which facts they emphasize or leave out.

Center-leaning sources cover the story neutrally by presenting the facts of Paul Ingrassia's withdrawal and the alleged offensive texts without editorializing. They attribute controversial statements to sources and include diverse reactions from Republicans, Democrats, and Ingrassia's lawyer, allowing readers to form their own conclusions about the event and its political ramifications.

"Ingrassia, 30, said he was withdrawing his name to lead the Office of Special Counsel (OSC) "because unfortunately I do not have enough Republican votes at this time"."

BBC NewsBBC News
·19d
Article

"Paul Ingrassia, who was nominated to lead the Office of Special Counsel, withdrew from consideration Tuesday evening, after his offensive text messages were made public and GOP senators revolted."

NPRNPR
·19d
Article

"Ingrassia has faced bipartisan blowback since Politico reported Monday on incendiary texts that he allegedly sent in a group chat, including ones where he purportedly called Martin Luther King Jr. 'the 1960s George Floyd' and said he has 'a Nazi streak in me from time to time.'"

CBS NewsCBS News
·19d
Article

"Ingrassia withdrew from the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing set for Oct. 23 due to a lack of support from Republican senators following reports of his racist and antisemitic texts."

USA TODAYUSA TODAY
·19d
Article

"Paul Ingrassia, who was nominated to lead the Office of Special Counsel, withdrew from consideration Tuesday evening, after his offensive text messages were made public and GOP senators revolted."

Chicago TribuneChicago Tribune
·19d
Limited access — this outlet restricts by article count and/or content type.
Article

"Paul Ingrassia, who was nominated to lead the Office of Special Counsel, withdrew from consideration Tuesday evening, after his offensive text messages were made public and GOP senators revolted."

Associated PressAssociated Press
·19d
Article

"The growing opposition to Paul Ingrassia comes after a Politico report of a text chat that showed him saying the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday should be “tossed into the seventh circle of hell.”"

Associated PressAssociated Press
·19d
Article

"President Donald Trump's nominee to lead an influential government office is losing GOP support fast after a media report that he sent a series of racist and antisemitic texts."

USA TODAYUSA TODAY
·19d
Article

"Rejecting Ingrassia’s nomination would be a rare rebuke of Trump by a Senate Republican Conference that has shown a notable level of deference to confirming his nominees, even if senators have concerns about their histories or qualifications."

NBC NewsNBC News
·20d
Article

"It’s a rare repudiation of a Trump nominee by a Republican Senate that has largely gone along with the president’s staffing choices."

SemaforSemafor
·20d
Article

Articles (27)

Compare how different news outlets are covering this story.

FAQ

Dig deeper on this story with frequently asked questions.

The Office of Special Counsel (OSC) is an independent federal investigative and prosecutorial agency responsible for protecting federal employees and applicants from prohibited personnel practices, especially those related to whistleblower reprisal, discrimination, and improper political influence. Its work is crucial for safeguarding merit-based civil service and government accountability.

Paul Ingrassia served as White House liaison to the Department of Justice from January to February 2025 and was later reassigned to the Department of Homeland Security. His tenure was marked by investigations into alleged misconduct and the publication of racist text messages, which prompted several Republican senators to oppose his nomination as Special Counsel. Controversies included his lack of legal experience, past denigrating comments about federal workers, and rumored associations with extremists[1].

Multiple Republican senators, including Senate Majority Leader John Thune, withdrew their support for Ingrassia’s nomination after the emergence of alleged offensive text messages and called on the White House to recall his nomination, citing the seriousness of the allegations.

Ingrassia denied any wrongdoing, and his attorney questioned the authenticity and intent of the messages, suggesting they were satirical or potentially AI-generated. However, the controversy led to his withdrawal from consideration before any confirmation hearing took place.

Critics and whistleblower groups have highlighted Ingrassia’s lack of significant legal experience, his history of controversial commentary, and alleged ties to online extremism. The rapid advancement of a nominee with limited professional qualifications and a history of inflammatory remarks raised questions about the vetting process and the administration’s priorities[3].

History

See how this story has evolved over time.

  • 19d
    MSNBC logo
    CBS News logo
    Epoch Times logo
    15 articles
  • 19d
    Associated Press logo
    CNN logo
    PBS NewsHour logo
    4 articles
  • 20d
    NBC News logo
    Washington Examiner logo
    New York Daily News logo
    5 articles