Left-leaning sources frame this story by portraying Trump's decision to delay federal troops in San Francisco as a retreat, driven by personal appeals rather than genuine progress. They emphasize strong opposition from Democratic leaders like Governor Newsom, who characterizes Trump's actions as dictatorial and based on "fictitious" crime rates, collectively dismissing the premise of a crime crisis requiring federal intervention.

"Activists and San Francisco residents are not exactly convinced, and so the organizing continues."

Wired

·11d

Limited access — this outlet restricts by article count and/or content type.

Article

"Trump's decision to reverse course on Thursday mirrored that of one of his supporters, Marc Benioff."

Al Jazeera

·11d

Article

"Donald Trump has cancelled plans for a deployment of federal troops to the San Francisco Bay Area that had sparked widespread condemnation from California leaders and sent protesters flooding into the streets."

The Guardian

·11d

Article

"The sway tech leaders now have over government policy is far more vast than any previous administration, including Trump’s first term."

The Guardian

·11d

Article

"Trump’s decision to delay troops comes after California Governor Gavin Newsom condemned the move, which is just the latest example of the Trump administration sending federal agents into Democratic-led cities."

Daily Beast

·11d

Article

Right-leaning sources frame this story by immediately labeling San Francisco as a "crime-ridden city," setting a negative context for Trump's decision to delay federal intervention. They prioritize the administration's narrative, emphasizing Trump's willingness to collaborate while subtly reinforcing the idea that progressive cities struggle with crime and may ultimately require federal oversight to improve.

"Therefore, we will not surge San Francisco on Saturday."

Daily Caller

·11d

Article