Alabama Executes Anthony Boyd Using Nitrogen Gas for 1993 Murder
Anthony Boyd, 54, was executed in Alabama with nitrogen gas for the 1993 murder of Gregory Huguley over a $200 drug debt, despite legal challenges and controversy surrounding the method.
Subscribe to unlock this story
We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $5/month, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!
Get StartedHave an account? Sign in
Overview
- Anthony Boyd, 54, was executed in Alabama at the William C. Holman Correctional Facility for the 1993 murder of Gregory Huguley, which originated from a $200 drug debt.
- The execution employed nitrogen gas, a controversial method Alabama adopted as an alternative to lethal injection, due to pharmaceutical companies' refusal to provide necessary drugs for capital punishment.
- Boyd's lawyers requested a halt to his execution, seeking further scrutiny of the nitrogen gas method, while Boyd personally requested an alternative like a firing squad.
- The U.S. Supreme Court denied Boyd's request to stay his execution by nitrogen gas, allowing the procedure to proceed despite legal efforts to pause it.
- Arguments were raised that the nitrogen gas method violated the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment, sparking debate on its legality.
Report issue
Read both sides in 5 minutes each day
Analysis
Center-leaning sources frame this story by emphasizing the controversial nature of nitrogen gas executions and the inmate's claims of innocence. They highlight judicial objections, graphic witness accounts of suffering, and Boyd's plea for mercy, while presenting the state's justification more briefly. This collective editorial choice creates a narrative focused on the method's cruelty and the inmate's plight.
Articles (4)
FAQ
Alabama authorities have stated that nitrogen gas executions are intended to be a humane alternative to lethal injection, especially after pharmaceutical companies restricted the supply of drugs traditionally used in executions. They have claimed in court that the method works as intended, although independent witnesses and critics argue it causes significant suffering and may violate constitutional protections against cruel and unusual punishment.
Lawyers challenged Alabama's use of nitrogen gas executions on two key constitutional grounds: that it violates the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment and that withholding an unredacted execution protocol denies due process. These arguments were supported by medical and eyewitness testimony of apparent suffering during previous executions, and were heard in federal court before the Supreme Court ultimately allowed the execution to proceed[4].
Witnesses have described prolonged and distressing deaths during nitrogen gas executions, with inmates reportedly shaking, convulsing, writhing, and gasping for air for extended periods. For example, Kenneth Smith was observed thrashing and convulsing for several minutes before being pronounced dead at least 22 minutes after the procedure began, contradicting state assurances that death would be quick and painless.
United Nations human rights experts have condemned the use of nitrogen gas in executions, warning that it may amount to torture and urging Alabama to halt its use of the method. Veterinary guidelines in both the U.S. and Europe also discourage nitrogen gas for euthanasia in animals due to ethical concerns, citing distress, panic, and seizure-like behavior as likely outcomes[2].
Anthony Boyd maintained his innocence throughout his incarceration, specifically denying participation in the crime during his final words. He also criticized the criminal justice system for perceived injustice. Boyd’s legal team argued for alternative execution methods and questioned the lack of transparency regarding the nitrogen gas protocol.
History
- This story does not have any previous versions.