Colorado Sues Trump Administration Over Space Command Relocation to Alabama
Colorado accuses President Trump of illegally relocating U.S. Space Command to Alabama as retaliation for its mail-in voting system, prompting a federal lawsuit.
Subscribe to unlock this story
We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $5/month, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!
Get StartedHave an account? Sign in
Overview
- Colorado officials accuse President Trump of illegally retaliating against the state by relocating U.S. Space Command headquarters to Alabama.
- President Trump reportedly cited Colorado's mail-in voting system as a primary reason for moving the Space Command headquarters to Huntsville, Alabama.
- Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser filed a federal lawsuit to block the relocation, alleging it is unconstitutional and serves as punishment.
- The move involves the planned transfer of approximately 1,400 Space Command jobs to Alabama's Redstone Arsenal over the next five years.
- Colorado's lawsuit also raises concerns about potential pressure or punishment for other states utilizing mail-in voting systems in the future.
Report issue

Read both sides in 5 minutes each day
Analysis
Center-leaning sources cover this story neutrally, focusing on reporting the facts of the legal dispute. They present the claims made by Colorado officials regarding the Space Command relocation and equally include the counter-arguments from Alabama's Attorney General. The coverage provides necessary context and background without adopting a particular stance or using evaluative language.
Articles (4)
Center (2)
FAQ
Colorado's lawsuit alleges that the Trump administration's decision to move U.S. Space Command to Alabama was unconstitutional, arguing it violated the Tenth Amendment and the Elections Clause by retaliating against the state for its mail-in voting system. The state claims the relocation was a punitive measure for Colorado's exercise of its sovereign right to regulate elections, and not based on legitimate defense or operational considerations.
Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall has vowed to vigorously defend the Space Command relocation in court, asserting that the original decision under President Trump was factually sound and justified by military experts and independent reviews. Marshall accuses the Biden administration of politicizing the process and insists the law and facts support keeping the headquarters in Huntsville[2].
If Colorado prevails, U.S. Space Command headquarters would likely remain in Colorado Springs, averting the planned transfer of approximately 1,400 jobs and related economic activity to Alabama over the next five years. The case could also set a precedent regarding federal retaliation against states for their election practices, potentially influencing how similar disputes are resolved in the future[1].
Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser has emphasized that there is no evidence of fraud in the state's mail-in voting system, which has been supported by both major parties since 2013. The state argues that the Trump administration did not follow proper procedures before announcing the move, and that the decision lacked a legitimate defense justification, suggesting it was politically motivated.
The lawsuit raises concerns about whether the federal government can use military base relocations as a tool to punish states for their election policies, potentially chilling innovation in election administration nationwide. It also highlights ongoing tensions between state sovereignty over elections and federal authority, with implications for future conflicts between states and the federal government over similar issues[3].
History
- This story does not have any previous versions.


