Federal Judge Rules Education Department's Partisan Shutdown Messages Unconstitutional
A federal judge ruled that the Education Department's out-of-office messages, which blamed Democrats for a government shutdown, violated workers' free speech rights and were unconstitutional.
Overview
- A federal judge issued a ruling concerning partisan language used within the Education Department's out-of-office messages during a government shutdown.
- The messages explicitly blamed Democrats for the government shutdown, which was the core issue brought before the court.
- Judge Cooper determined that this partisan language was unconstitutional, infringing upon the free speech rights of the department's employees.
- The ruling specifically stated that the Department of Education violated its workers' First Amendment rights by using these politically charged messages.
- This decision highlights legal boundaries for government agencies regarding political messaging, particularly when it involves blaming specific political parties for government actions.
Report issue

Read both sides in 5 minutes each day
Analysis
Center-leaning sources cover this story neutrally by focusing on the factual details of the federal judge's ruling. They present the legal decision and its implications without editorializing, allowing the facts of the case and direct quotes from the judge to convey the core information. The reporting avoids loaded language and provides full context.
Articles (3)
Center (1)
FAQ
Judge Cooper ruled the messages unconstitutional because they forced civil servants to convey partisan political messages, violating their First Amendment rights by making them unwilling spokespeople for the administration's political blame.
The messages stated: 'Unfortunately, Democrat Senators are blocking passage of H.R. 5371 in the Senate which has led to a lapse in appropriations,' directly blaming Democrats for the government shutdown.
The judge's order permanently blocks the department from including partisan speech in the out-of-office messages of employees who are furloughed or on leave, requiring them to cease using politically charged language.
The ruling sets a precedent that federal agencies cannot use their employees as vehicles for partisan political messaging, reinforcing First Amendment protections for civil servants across the government.
This case highlights the legal principle that government agencies must respect the free speech rights of their employees and cannot compel them to express political views, especially during government shutdowns or other politically sensitive events.
History
- This story does not have any previous versions.


