DOJ Admits Grand Jury Did Not Review Final Comey Indictment Amid Vindictive Prosecution Claims
Federal judges question James Comey's indictment after the DOJ admitted the full grand jury never reviewed the final charges, bolstering claims of vindictive prosecution.
Overview
- James Comey pleaded not guilty to false statement and obstruction charges, with his legal team asserting the prosecution is politically motivated and vindictive, directed by President Trump.
- Federal judges are scrutinizing the Justice Department's handling of Comey's case, citing a disturbing pattern of investigative missteps and potential misconduct within the grand jury process.
- The Justice Department admitted that the full grand jury did not review the final indictment against Comey, raising significant concerns about procedural lapses and the integrity of the process.
- Interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan reportedly did not present the altered indictment to the full grand jury after a count was rejected, with only two jurors present for its return.
- Comey's lawyers argue these procedural irregularities and the lack of full grand jury review validate their claims of vindictive prosecution, with federal judges questioning the indictment's validity.
Report issue
Read both sides in 5 minutes each day
Analysis
Center-leaning sources frame this story by emphasizing the prosecution's procedural irregularities and alleged political motivations. They highlight judicial skepticism and the defense's claims of vindictive prosecution, often connecting the case directly to former President Trump's influence and the prosecutor's lack of experience. This collective framing questions the legitimacy of the charges against James Comey.
"Judge Nachmanoff pressed DOJ attorney Tyler Lemons about the existence of a memo recommending against bringing charges, asking, "Was there a declination memo?""
ABC News"Comey has also challenged the lawfulness of Halligan's appointment, and a separate judge appointed to handle some issues in the case said in a Nov. 17 opinion that a host of potential irregularities in the grand jury process that led to the indictment could be grounds to dismiss the case."
USA TODAY"Comey’s lawyers believe the Trump administration has singled out their client because of his protected speech and what they call Trump’s “personal animus” toward Comey."
NBC News"The record "points to a disturbing pattern of profound investigative missteps, missteps that led an FBI agent and a prosecutor to potentially undermine the integrity of the grand jury proceeding," wrote Magistrate Judge William Fitzpatrick Nov. 17."
USA TODAY"The judge recognized the magnitude of his decision to allow Comey's lawyers access to the grand jury material, which is typically kept secret, writing in a scathing 24-page decision that he is granting an "extraordinary remedy" to fully protect Comey's legal rights."
CBS News"the government’s actions in this case –whether purposeful, reckless, or negligent – raise genuine issues of misconduct, are inextricably linked to the government’s grand jury presentation, and deserve to be fully explored by the defense."
NBC News"The Court recognizes that the relief sought by the defense is rarely granted, however, the record points to a disturbing pattern of profound investigative missteps, missteps that led an FBI agent and a prosecutor to potentially undermine the integrity of the grand jury proceeding."
Associated PressArticles (25)
Center (7)
FAQ
Federal judges are questioning Comey's indictment because the Justice Department admitted that the full grand jury did not review the final charges, raising concerns about procedural lapses and the integrity of the indictment process.
Comey's legal team argues that the prosecution is politically motivated and vindictive, targeting Comey for being a vocal critic of President Trump, and that procedural irregularities support claims of vindictive prosecution.
The Justice Department admitted that after a count was rejected, the altered indictment was not presented to the full grand jury, and only two jurors were present when the indictment was returned, rather than the entire grand jury reviewing it.
The Justice Department denied evidence of vindictive prosecution, maintaining that the charges are justified and not politically motivated, although federal judges have expressed concern over the procedural issues.
The judge has taken under advisement the arguments about vindictive prosecution and procedural irregularities, and will review the matter further before making a ruling on whether the indictment should be dismissed.
History
- 18d
3 articles - 20d
5 articles
- 20d12 articles
