Military Times logo
Associated Press logo
USA TODAY logo
3 articles
·3h

U.S. Coast Guard Updates Hate Symbol Policy, Faces Criticism Over 'Potentially Divisive' Label

The U.S. Coast Guard updated its policy on hate symbols, classifying swastikas and nooses as "potentially divisive." This change draws criticism, though existing prohibitions remain.

Overview

A summary of the key points of this story verified across multiple sources.

  • The U.S. Coast Guard is implementing new policies and language concerning the display of hate symbols, including swastikas and nooses, within its ranks.
  • Under the updated policy, symbols such as swastikas and nooses are now officially categorized as "potentially divisive," a change from previous classifications.
  • The new policy maintains the existing prohibition on the public display of the Confederate flag, ensuring its continued ban within the Coast Guard.
  • Democratic Sen. Jacky Rosen has voiced strong criticism, arguing the policy's classification of swastikas as "potentially divisive" weakens protections against bigotry.
  • Adm. Kevin Lunday clarified that the updated policy does not reverse any prior prohibitions on hate symbols, aiming to address concerns about potential rollbacks.
Written by AI using shared reports from
3 articles
.

Report issue

Pano Newsletter

Read both sides in 5 minutes each day

Analysis

Compare how each side frames the story — including which facts they emphasize or leave out.

Center-leaning sources frame this story by emphasizing the perceived softening of the Coast Guard's stance on hate symbols. They highlight the shift in terminology from "hate incident" to "potentially divisive" and prioritize strong criticism from lawmakers. While including the Coast Guard's defense and broader military context, the narrative's structure and initial focus underscore the controversial nature of the policy changes.

"The new Coast Guard policy, which is set to take effect on Dec. 15 and was first reported by The Washington Post, is facing pushback."

Military TimesMilitary Times
·6h
Article

"The new policy explicitly says that “the terminology ‘hate incident’ is no longer present in policy” and conduct that would have previously been handled as a potential hate incident will now be treated as “a report of harassment in cases with an identified aggrieved individual.”"

Associated PressAssociated Press
·7h
Article

"The updated harassment regulation said that displaying the symbols may still merit harassment investigations, but the service no longer recognizes hate incidents as a specific category of misconduct."

USA TODAYUSA TODAY
·7h
Article

Articles (3)

Compare how different news outlets are covering this story.

FAQ

Dig deeper on this story with frequently asked questions.

The Coast Guard updated its language to classify swastikas and nooses as 'potentially divisive' to reflect a broader policy approach, but it maintains existing prohibitions on their public display. The change in terminology is meant to clarify internal guidance without reversing prior bans.

No, the updated policy continues to prohibit the public display of the Confederate flag within the Coast Guard, maintaining the existing ban.

Democratic Sen. Jacky Rosen and others have criticized the policy, arguing that labeling swastikas as 'potentially divisive' instead of explicitly banning them weakens protections against bigotry and could be seen as downplaying the severity of hate symbols.

No, Adm. Kevin Lunday clarified that the updated policy does not reverse any prior prohibitions on hate symbols. The Coast Guard continues to ban the public display of symbols like swastikas, nooses, and the Confederate flag.

History

See how this story has evolved over time.

  • This story does not have any previous versions.