Supreme Court Temporarily Reinstates Texas Congressional Map Amid Racial Bias Allegations
The Supreme Court temporarily reinstated Texas's new congressional map, blocking lower court rulings that found it likely racially biased, as the state appeals.
Overview
- The U.S. Supreme Court temporarily blocked lower court rulings that found Texas's new congressional redistricting plan likely racially biased, reinstating the map.
- Lower federal courts and a three-judge panel had deemed Texas's House and congressional maps unconstitutional racial gerrymanders, specifically targeting Black and Hispanic voters.
- Texas appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing the redistricting was a lawful partisan gerrymander aimed at securing Republican House seats, not racially motivated.
- Justice Alito temporarily reinstated the map, as the Supreme Court considers its use in upcoming midterm elections and awaits a response from civil rights groups.
- The Supreme Court intervened as Texas faces a December 8 candidate filing deadline for March primaries, seeking a longer-term stay of the lower court ruling.
Report issue
Read both sides in 5 minutes each day
Analysis
Center-leaning sources cover this story neutrally, focusing on factual reporting of the Supreme Court's temporary block and the ongoing redistricting battle. They present legal developments and political context without employing loaded language or selective emphasis, ensuring a balanced overview. The coverage explains the motivations and outcomes for all parties involved.
"The administrative stay is a temporary ruling that allows Texas to continue to use their new map for now, as the Supreme Court reviews the case."
NBC News"The Supreme Court on Friday temporarily halted a lower court order that threw out Texas' redrawn congressional maps in time for next month's candidate filing deadline."
CBS News"The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday temporarily blocked a lower court ruling that found Texas’ 2026 congressional redistricting plan pushed by President Donald Trump likely discriminates on the basis of race."
Associated PressArticles (9)
FAQ
The lower court ruled the map was racially biased because Texas officials, including Governor Abbott and Republican lawmakers, made public comments indicating that racial considerations influenced the redrawing of district lines, and the map was designed to manipulate the racial composition of districts to benefit Republicans.
The Supreme Court's temporary reinstatement allows Texas to use the new congressional map in the upcoming midterm elections while the court considers the state's appeal, preventing confusion and disruption as candidate filing deadlines approach.
Texas officials, including Governor Abbott, claimed the redistricting was necessary due to constitutional concerns and argued it would increase the number of Hispanic-majority districts, though critics say the real intent was to secure more Republican seats.
If the Supreme Court upholds the lower court's ruling, Texas would likely have to revert to the previous congressional map drawn by the GOP-controlled Legislature in 2021, based on the 2020 census, for future elections.
The Supreme Court's temporary order is in place for at least several days while the court considers whether to grant a longer-term stay, with a response expected before the December 8 candidate filing deadline for March primaries.
History
- This story does not have any previous versions.