The Guardian logo
Daily Beast logo
FOX News logo
40 articles
·8h

Criminal Cases Against Comey and James Dismissed Over Illegal Prosecutor Appointment; Attorney General Bondi Vows Further Action

Federal judges dismissed criminal cases against James Comey and Letitia James due to an illegally appointed prosecutor. Attorney General Pam Bondi vows further legal action against them.

Overview

A summary of the key points of this story verified across multiple sources.

  • Federal judges dismissed criminal cases against James Comey and Letitia James, citing the unlawful appointment of Lindsey Halligan as Interim U.S. Attorney by the Trump administration.
  • Two judges, including U.S. District Judge Cameron Currie, ruled Halligan's appointment invalid and illegal, violating federal laws and the Constitution's Appointments Clause, leading to procedural dismissals.
  • Comey faced charges for false statements and obstruction related to 2020 Russian election meddling testimony, while James was indicted for mortgage and bank-fraud counts.
  • Both Comey and James claimed the prosecutions were flawed and vindictive; a majority of Americans reportedly believe these cases against Trump's foes were unjustified.
  • U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi has called for legal action, warning Comey and James that the Department of Justice is not finished and intends to appeal the dismissals.
Written by AI using shared reports from
40 articles
.

Report issue

Pano Newsletter

Read both sides in 5 minutes each day

Analysis

Compare how each side frames the story — including which facts they emphasize or leave out.

Center-leaning sources cover the story neutrally by presenting the judge's ruling and its legal basis without editorializing. They include direct quotes from all key parties—Comey, James, the White House, and Attorney General Bondi—allowing readers to understand diverse perspectives. Factual background on the prosecutor's appointment and legal arguments from both sides are also provided, ensuring balanced reporting.

"The ruling said the prosecutor overseeing their cases was appointed unlawfully, rejecting arguments the Trump administration has used to install loyalists as prosecutors across the country."

SemaforSemafor
·12h
Article

"The rulings from U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie halt at least for now a pair of prosecutions that had targeted two of the president’s most high-profile political opponents and amount to a stunning rebuke of the Trump administration’s legal maneuvering to install an inexperienced and loyalist prosecutor willing to file the cases."

Chicago Sun-TimesChicago Sun-Times
·13h
Article

"Trump's decision to replace Siebert with Halligan was a desperate move driven by personal vendettas."

ReasonReason
·13h
Article

"The judge ruled that the appointment of the prosecutor in the case was invalid."

ABC NewsABC News
·16h
Article

"The rulings from U.S. District Judge Cameron Currie are a significant victory for Comey and James, who both argued their prosecutions are retaliatory and motivated by President Trump's efforts to punish his political foes."

CBS NewsCBS News
·16h
Article

"The decision by U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie is a blow to the Trump administration, in a case widely seen as an effort to enact retribution against the president’s enemies."

DeadlineDeadline
·17h
Article

"The indictments were dismissed in a way that permits the Justice Department to attempt to secure new charges."

USA TODAYUSA TODAY
·17h
Article

"The decision from U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie on the appointment of Lindsey Halligan as the top prosecutor in the Eastern District of Virginia marks a significant setback to efforts to go after the president's perceived political enemies."

NPRNPR
·17h
Article

"The rulings from U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie halt at least for now a pair of prosecutions that had hastened concerns that the Justice Department was being weaponized to pursue the president’s political adversaries and amount to a stunning rebuke of the Trump administration’s legal maneuvering to install a loyal, and inexperienced, prosecutor willing to file the cases."

Associated PressAssociated Press
·17h
Article

"The invalidation of Halligan’s appointment was fatal to the Comey and James indictments because of the unique role Halligan played in the cases against two of Trump’s political enemies, but it could have ripple effects on other cases that were handled under more typical processes."

NBC NewsNBC News
·17h
Article

Articles (40)

Compare how different news outlets are covering this story.

FAQ

Dig deeper on this story with frequently asked questions.

Lindsey Halligan was appointed by former President Trump as the interim U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia to prosecute cases against James Comey and Letitia James, despite having no prior prosecutorial experience and an appointment later ruled illegal.

Federal judges dismissed the cases because Lindsey Halligan's appointment as interim U.S. Attorney was deemed unlawful and invalid, violating federal laws and the Appointments Clause of the Constitution, leading to procedural dismissals.

Comey faced charges of making false statements and obstruction related to his 2020 testimony on Russian election interference, while Letitia James was indicted on counts of mortgage and bank fraud.

Pam Bondi vowed further legal action, stating that the Department of Justice is not finished and intends to appeal the dismissals against Comey and James.

A majority of Americans reportedly believe that these cases against Trump’s foes, including Comey and James, were unjustified and politically motivated.

History

See how this story has evolved over time.

  • 12h
    Slate logo
    Salon logo
    Washington Examiner logo
    10 articles
  • 15h
    New York Sun logo
    ABC News logo
    CBS News logo
    20 articles