White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles Sparks Controversy with Candid Remarks on Trump and Allies, Receives Strong Defense
White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles made candid remarks about President Trump's personality and inner circle in Vanity Fair interviews, sparking controversy but receiving strong defense from Trump and allies.
Overview
- Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff, provided candid insights into President Trump's administration and potential second term agenda during interviews with Vanity Fair.
- Wiles described Trump as having an "alcoholic's personality" despite his teetotaler status, a characterization Trump agreed with, while allies defended her.
- She also criticized Attorney General Pam Bondi, labeled Vice President JD Vance a "conspiracy theorist," and called Elon Musk an "odd duck" and "avowed ketamine user."
- President Trump, Trump Jr., and Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt strongly defended Wiles, praising her loyalty, effectiveness, and leadership amidst the controversy.
- Wiles criticized Vanity Fair's article as a "disingenuously framed hit piece," claiming it lacked crucial context and created a negative narrative about the administration.
Report issue
Read both sides in 5 minutes each day
Analysis
Center-leaning sources cover this story neutrally by reporting the controversial statements made by Susie Wiles in Vanity Fair and immediately presenting her strong rebuttal. They avoid editorializing on Wiles' remarks or her criticism of Vanity Fair, instead focusing on the factual reporting of the unfolding controversy and the various responses from administration figures, ensuring a balanced presentation of the event.
"Wiles called the article on social media “a disingenuously framed hit piece” on her, Trump and his Cabinet."
USA TODAY"Wiles denounced the story on X as "a disingenuously framed hit piece on me and the finest President, White House staff, and Cabinet in history.""
NBC News"Wiles described Trump as an intense figure who thinks in broad strokes yet is often unconcerned about process and policy details."
Associated Press"Wiles called the story a "disingenuously framed hit piece on me and the finest President, White House staff, and Cabinet in history.""
CBS News"Wiles took to X, accusing the magazine of "disingenuously framed hit piece" aimed at her, Trump and other cabinet members."
BBC News"Wiles said it is a "disingenuously framed hit piece on me and the finest President, White House staff, and Cabinet in history.""
ABC News"Wiles called the article on social media “a disingenuously framed hit piece” on her, Trump and his Cabinet."
USA TODAY"Wiles reportedly said, “Well, that might be the one retribution.”"
NBC News"Wiles posted on X on Tuesday, “The article published early this morning is a disingenuously framed hit piece on me and the finest President, White House staff, and Cabinet in history."
DeadlineArticles (29)
Center (9)
FAQ
As of reporting, neither the White House nor official channels have announced disciplinary action against Wiles; she and senior aides publicly defended her and President Trump praised her, making formal consequences unlikely in the immediate term.
Trump, his son, and press secretary Karoline Leavitt issued strong public defenses, praising Wiles’s loyalty and leadership and dismissing the Vanity Fair piece as unfair, while Wiles herself called the article a “disingenuously framed hit piece.”
Wiles described Trump as having an “alcoholic’s personality,” criticized Attorney General Pam Bondi, labeled Vice President J.D. Vance a “conspiracy theorist,” and called Elon Musk an “odd duck” and an “avowed ketamine user,” according to the Vanity Fair reporting summarized in coverage.
Wiles gave candid insights about priorities for a potential second term, but coverage emphasizes her characterizations of people rather than concrete policy shifts; no major personnel changes or formal second-term agenda items were announced in the reporting.
At the time of the articles summarizing the controversy, coverage notes Wiles’s rebuttal but does not report a published formal response from Vanity Fair in those pieces; follow-up statements from the magazine or reporters were not cited in the sources reviewed.
History
- 14h
3 articles