Vance Refers Walz and Ellison to DOJ Over Minnesota Fraud Allegations
Referral asks DOJ Fraud Division to probe alleged failures to stop nearly $300 million in child nutrition losses and about $9 billion in Medicaid, the House committee report says.

Fraud czar JD Vance asks DOJ to investigate Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison

Tim Walz Gets Referred to DOJ for 'Full Criminal Investigation'

JD Vance announces criminal referral against MN Gov. Tim Walz and AG Keith Ellison

JD Vance Just Took Huge Action Against Tim Walz and Keith Ellison
Overview
Vice President JD Vance referred a House Oversight Committee report to the Justice Department's new Fraud Division asking for criminal probes of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison, Vance wrote on X.
A Republican-led House Oversight Committee released a report alleging almost $300 million in federal child nutrition losses and about $9 billion in Medicaid issues and that warnings reached senior state officials.
Gov. Tim Walz's office called the committee "nothing more than a joke," and Attorney General Keith Ellison called the allegations unfounded and Vance's referral a political stunt, while the Justice Department did not immediately respond.
Federal prosecutors charged dozens in Minnesota schemes including a $250 million Feeding Our Future fraud whose orchestrator, Aimee Bock, was sentenced to nearly 42 years, and investigators executed at least 22 search warrants in April.
The Justice Department's response remained unclear as Vance's referral goes to the new Fraud Division led by Colin McDonald, a unit the White House announced in January that initially would answer directly to the president.
Analysis
Center-leaning sources frame the referral as politically charged, emphasizing context that links Vance and the DOJ action to Trump’s broader “war on fraud” and past probes. Editorial choices—placement of denials, highlighting raids that invoked Somali communities, and reliance on committee allegations—tilt coverage toward skepticism about motives.