States Fight USPS Ballot Rules

States say USPS mail-ballot limits could disrupt voting amid fraud probes.

Left & Center

9 left7 center0 right

Updated Sep 9, 9:12pm ET

Every side, every morning

A free recap of the day’s biggest stories and how each side covered them.

The reporting

A neutral summary of the key facts most sources agree on, drawn from reporting across the political spectrum.

California and 22 other states, plus the District of Columbia, asked the Supreme Court to keep a Boston federal judge’s order blocking parts of the Trump administration’s new Postal Service mail-ballot rule for the November midterms. The rule would require states to rapidly revise mail voting systems with new voter lists and bar-coded envelopes, giving USPS a screening role before ballots are delivered. The states said compliance would be impossible in some places and could prevent millions from voting by mail. Nearly 40 current and former election officials from 10 states also urged the court to block the rule.

Analysis & opinion

The arguments that emerged from this coverage — built only from the analysis and opinion pieces, never from straight reporting. Each dot is one article, placed by its outlet's bias — left to right. How we label coverage →
angles sorted left-argued → right-argued
·

Postal Ballot SabotageMostly Left

Trump’s plan to give the Postal Service a role in mail-ballot verification is a partisan attempt to interfere with the midterms. It would create legal and practical chaos for mail voting, so courts should block it before it disrupts the election.

Raw Story
The Bulwark
T

Election Interference ThreatMostly Left

The Trump administration’s election interventions are damaging rather than protective, built around fruitless voter-fraud efforts and unprecedented federal meddling. Those actions distract from real election threats and risk undermining free, fair access to the ballot this fall.

Reason
TPM
Washington Monthly