Trump Defends LA-San Diego Remarks

Trump defended comments suggesting Iran could strike Los Angeles or San Diego.

Balanced

9 left3 center4 right

Updated 11:15am ET

Every side, every morning

A free recap of the day’s biggest stories and how each side covered them.

What happened

Trump defended his remarks about Iran possibly striking California cities, telling a San Antonio rally that his administration would protect Los Angeles and San Diego. Two days earlier, he said Iran could “take out” those cities while arguing the war’s costs were worth paying. Trump has presented the war as necessary to stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, saying higher prices were preferable to that risk. The White House said he was warning about a threat the war was meant to prevent, while California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said the comments could endanger public safety. Newsom said California opened its emergency operations center.

How each side covered it

From the left

Left-leaning outlets treated Trump’s return to the subject as a fight over clarification and dangerous language. HuffPost cast the Texas remarks as damage control that clarified he meant to prevent, not invite, an Iranian attack, and quoted Seth Meyers arguing that Trump’s incoherent language was itself a serious problem. The Los Angeles Times presented the remarks as a dangerous invitation to attack U.S. cities, warranting outrage and demands for accountability rather than White House spin.

From the right

Right-leaning outlets cast the backlash as distortion, saying Trump was warning about a threat rather than welcoming one. The New York Post argued that higher gas prices were “a small price to pay” to stop Iran’s nuclear ambitions, called the criticism an anti-Trump hoax aimed at the midterms, and used the uproar to mock California leaders over Los Angeles’s existing dangers.

Headlines