JD Vance Defends Ramaswamy Attack Ad

Vance defended Ramaswamy’s ad featuring Amy Acton’s mother and rebuked Republican critics.

Left & Center

47 left19 center13 right

Updated 5:02pm ET

Both sides, every morning

The day’s biggest stories and how each side covered them. Free.

What happened

Vivek Ramaswamy’s campaign acknowledged producing an online ad featuring Amy Acton’s estranged mother, Donna Arthur, and said it would spend $4 million to air it statewide despite bipartisan criticism. The ad called Acton a liar, disputed her account of childhood homelessness, and first circulated without naming its sponsor. Acton, a physician and former Ohio public health director, is the Democratic candidate against Ramaswamy, a Republican, with Election Day about two weeks away. Acton says her stepfather sexually abused her as a child, and court records say he was charged in 1978. Ramaswamy said Arthur was not paid. Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose said his office was reviewing complaints over disclaimer or funding rules.

How each side covered it

From the left

Left-leaning outlets framed the ad as an exploitation of Acton’s trauma, stressing moral backlash over campaign strategy. The Los Angeles Times said the spot exploited her childhood and could overshadow the race’s final stretch. HuffPost emphasized bipartisan backlash and highlighted JD Vance’s defense of winning over objections.

From the right

Right-leaning outlets treated the ad as a risky attack whose value turned on credibility and victory. The Daily Mail focused on Ramaswamy doubling down despite conservative criticism. Patriot Post cast Arthur’s claims as a damaging challenge to Acton’s honesty. The Daily Wire centered Vance’s call to stop “whining” and win.

Headlines