California Officials Push Back On DOJ

California officials called DOJ's ballot demands unworkable before Election Day.

45% left, 40% center, 15% right

Mostly Left

· 17 outlets

Summary

Updated Oct 25, 9:09pm ET

California officials pushed back on the Justice Department’s demand to set aside ballots tied to flagged voters. At a rare Sunday hearing, two Ninth Circuit judges questioned DOJ’s authority, timing and evidence, and issued no immediate ruling. The fight centers on whether Washington can force California to change ballot processing for people it says may be noncitizens. DOJ says federal law and the risk of unlawful votes justify segregation, while California says it controls election procedures and has safeguards. Local officials said counting had begun and would continue. State officials said a review found many listed voters appeared U.S.-born or had no voting history. The emergency request remained pending, with a district court hearing set for Oct. 27.

Left and right

From the left

Left-leaning outlets framed the case as federal interference, stressing partisan motives and risks to eligible voters rather than election-security urgency. CNN tied the push to Trump’s false fraud claims and highlighted doubts about federal power. The Guardian emphasized warnings from California election personnel that the demand could disenfranchise citizens.

From the right

Right-leaning outlets cast the fight as an urgent test of election security, focusing on suspected unlawful ballots before they enter the count. The New York Post praised DOJ’s move as “timely” and “welcome,” cited Bill Essayli’s warning that California could run out the clock, and pointed voters toward Proposition 39.

Both sides, every morning

The day’s biggest stories and how each side covered them. Free.

Articles