Democrats Seek Alaska Lawsuit Dismissal

Democrats and Mary Peltola’s campaign sought dismissal of DOJ’s Alaska Senate election lawsuit.

50% left, 29% center, 21% right

Leans Left

· 20 outlets

Summary

Updated Oct 26, 8:20pm ET

Democrats and Mary Peltola’s campaign asked a federal judge to dismiss the Justice Department’s lawsuit seeking to conditionally block certification of Alaska’s Senate election. The department sued Alaska election officials over a race between Republican incumbent Dan S. Sullivan, Democrat Mary Peltola and Daniel J. Sullivan Jr., whose similar name is central to the dispute. Alaska uses ranked-choice voting, and state courts previously allowed Daniel J. Sullivan Jr. to remain on a ballot that identifies the incumbent as a Republican and incumbent. The Justice Department says voters could be confused, while Trump said he directed the suit. Daniel J. Sullivan denies being recruited to spoil the race, and Democrats deny involvement. The election is scheduled for November 3, and whether the court will rule before then remains unresolved.

Left and right

From the left

Left-leaning outlets framed the suit as an attempt to undercut an unfavorable result before votes are finished, not as a neutral election safeguard. MS NOW called the case legally thin and cast the Justice Department as Trump’s political tool, saying the department was not hiding who runs it.

From the right

Right-leaning outlets framed the dispute around alleged voter confusion and objections to federal reach. Fox News reported Republicans’ allegation that Democrats propped up a same-name candidate to confuse voters, noted Schiff’s objection that DOJ was intruding on a ballot dispute Alaska courts had resolved, and described federal intervention as supported by existing election law.

Both sides, every morning

The day’s biggest stories and how each side covered them. Free.

Articles