Judge Bars President Trump’s WSJ Refiling
A judge dismissed President Trump’s amended WSJ suit with prejudice, barring refiling.
November 1, 2026 · Updated Nov 1, 3:20am ET
HuffPost'Grasping At Straws': Judge Dismisses Trump Suit Against Wall Street Journal Over Epstein Letter
VarietyJudge Dismisses Trump’s Wall Street Journal Defamation Lawsuit Over Published Epstein ‘Birthday Book’ for a Second Time
Washington TimesTrump loses lawsuit against Wall Street Journal over Epstein claims
Joe.My.God.Judge Boots Trump’s $10B Epstein Suit Against WSJ
BBC NewsJudge dismisses Trump's lawsuit against WSJ over Epstein birthday book
Daily MailJudge tosses Trump's $10bn lawsuit against Wall Street Journal
PBS NewsHourJudge dismisses Trump suit against Wall Street Journal over Epstein birthday letter
Straight Arrow NewsJudge dismisses Trump’s libel suit against WSJ over Epstein birthday letter
Just the NewsJudge dismisses Trump’s lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over Epstein reporting
NPR'Grasping at straws': Judge dismisses Trump suit against Wall Street Journal over Epstein letter
NewsweekList of Trump's media lawsuits as judge tosses WSJ Epstein note case
27%
Left · 3
46%
Center · 5
27%
Right · 3
Pano rates the coverage Balanced.
What happened
A judge barred President Trump from refiling his WSJ defamation claims by dismissing his amended lawsuit with prejudice. U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles
Darrin P. GaylesUnited States District Judge said Trump had not adequately alleged actual malice, the standard for public figures. The about $10 billion lawsuit, amended after an earlier dismissal without prejudice, grew from the Journal’s 2025 account of a suggestive letter bearing Trump’s name in Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey EpsteinAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)’s 2003 birthday album. Trump denied writing or signing the letter and called the story false; the Journal said the letter bore his name. Gayles did not decide authenticity or truth, citing the Journal’s request for Trump’s response and its inclusion of his denials. Trump’s legal team said he intends to appeal; defendants’ fee request remains pending.
How the left told it
Left-leaning outlets cast the ruling as a finding that Trump’s case lacked the actual-malice allegations needed to challenge the article. HuffPost framed it as a setback in Trump’s wider fight with news organizations. Joe.My.God. lingered on the court’s view that seeking Trump’s response and printing his denials showed sound reporting practices.
How the right told it
Right-leaning outlets emphasized First Amendment protections and Trump’s failure to show actual malice, rather than treating his denial as enough. Washington Times framed the dismissal around press protections, noting the federal judge found Trump had not overcome them. Daily Mail quoted US District Judge Darrin Gayles’s rebuke that the suit tried to “manufacture” flaws in the Journal’s investigation.
Trump WSJ Libel Case
Part of the storyline · Storyline →- Nov 1Judge Bars President Trump’s WSJ Refiling (this story)Balanced
- Oct 31Judge Ends President Trump’s WSJ LawsuitMostly Left
