


Thomson Reuters Secures Court Victory in AI Copyright Case Against Ross Intelligence
Thomson Reuters wins a significant copyright infringement case against Ross Intelligence, impacting AI training methods and fair use discussions.
Subscribe to unlock this story
We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $5/month, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!
Get StartedHave an account? Sign in
Overview
Thomson Reuters achieved a legal victory over Ross Intelligence in a copyright infringement lawsuit, establishing that Ross illegally used content from Westlaw without permission. Judge Stephanos Bibas ruled against Ross's fair use defense, stating it did not hold up under U.S. copyright laws. This case is pivotal as it will likely influence similar current and future legal battles regarding AI training methodologies, particularly as many tech companies face accusations of utilizing copyrighted works without authorization. While the decision specifically pertains to Ross's actions as a competitor, it raises significant discussions about fair use in the AI landscape.
Report issue

Read both sides in 5 minutes each day
Analysis
Analysis unavailable for this viewpoint.
Articles (3)
Center (3)
History
- This story does not have any previous versions.