CNN logo
NBC News logo
Associated Press logo
3 articles
·4M

Los Angeles DA Rejects Menendez Brothers' Bid for New Trial Amid Controversy Over Abuse Claims

District Attorney Nathan Hochman declines to support Erik and Lyle Menendez's request for a new trial, citing lack of credible evidence regarding sexual abuse.

Overview

A summary of the key points of this story verified across multiple sources.

Los Angeles DA Nathan Hochman rejects the Menendez brothers' request for a new trial over new evidence of sexual abuse, while considering a resentencing hearing in March. The DA emphasized that the evidence did not meet legal standards for a retrial, raising doubts over the credibility of abuse claims. The brothers, convicted of murdering their parents in 1989, have had their case reignited by new allegations and support from family. A decision on their resentencing is expected soon, with a hearing scheduled for March 20-21, 2024.

Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.

Pano Newsletter

Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.

Analysis

Compare how each side frames the story — including which facts they emphasize or leave out.

Analysis unavailable for this viewpoint.

Articles (3)

Compare how different news outlets are covering this story.

Center (2)

FAQ

Dig deeper on this story with frequently asked questions.

The new evidence includes a letter Erik Menendez wrote to his cousin detailing alleged abuse by his father, and allegations from a former member of Menudo, Roy Rossello, who claimed he was raped by Jose Menendez.

Hochman argued that the letter to Cano would have been used at trial if it existed, and Rossello's claims were not known to the brothers at the time of the crime, thus failing to meet legal standards for a retrial.

Besides the habeas corpus petition, the brothers are pursuing resentencing and clemency. A resentencing hearing is scheduled for March 20-21, and they have submitted a request for clemency to California Gov. Gavin Newsom.

If resentenced, the brothers could be eligible for parole immediately, as they were under 26 at the time of the crime. The proposed sentence would be 50 years to life.

History

See how this story has evolved over time.

  • This story does not have any previous versions.