


Mass Resignation from DOGE Amid Claims of Eroding Public Services
Twenty-one federal employees resign from Elon Musk's DOGE, protesting the dismantling of vital government services and risking sensitive data.
Overview
In a significant protest, 21 employees of the new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), previously the U.S. Digital Service, resigned, citing their refusal to jeopardize critical public services and data. Their joint letter, posted online, expressed concerns about being forced to support actions undermining effectively functioning government systems. The employees accused the administration of creating ideological tensions within the agency. In response, Elon Musk dismissed the resignations, calling them political holdovers resisting the new direction. This situation highlights escalating conflicts within the federal bureaucracy as the Trump administration pursues aggressive government downsizing strategies.
Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.

Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.
Analysis
- The resignation of 21 employees from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) highlights significant unrest within the federal workforce, fueled by concerns over the dismantling of critical public services under Elon Musk's leadership.
- These employees, previously part of the United States Digital Service, expressed their refusal to compromise government integrity or jeopardize sensitive data, stating that DOGE's efforts contradict their mission to modernize government technology.
- The ongoing situation has sparked bipartisan criticism, with some Republican lawmakers voicing concerns about the lack of respect and consideration afforded to federal workers during this restructuring process.
Articles (10)
Center (5)
FAQ
Elon Musk dismissed the resignations, labeling the employees as 'Dem political holdovers' who would have been fired if they hadn't resigned.
The Department of Government Efficiency, led by Elon Musk, is part of President Trump's initiative to reduce the size of the federal government. This includes efforts to eliminate waste and streamline government services, though critics argue it risks dismantling essential public services.
History
- This story does not have any previous versions.