


Federal Judge Rules Mass Firings Likely Unlawful, OPM Lacks Authority
A federal judge finds mass firings of probationary federal employees ordered by OPM likely unlawful, offering temporary relief amid ongoing legal battles.
Overview
A federal judge in San Francisco ruled that mass firings of probationary federal employees are likely unlawful, granting temporary relief to labor unions and other plaintiffs. U.S. District Judge William Alsup ordered the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to rescind its directive, asserting that OPM lacks authority to independently hire or fire employees across agencies. This ruling comes amid the Trump administration's significant workforce reductions led by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). An evidentiary hearing is set for March 13, as the legal battle has far-reaching implications for many federal workers.
Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.

Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.
Analysis
- A federal judge found that the mass firings ordered by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) were likely unlawful, ordering a temporary relief in favor of labor unions.
- The ruling highlights the ongoing conflict between the Trump administration's efforts to significantly reduce the federal workforce and the legal boundaries governing employment practices within federal agencies.
- Judge Alsup emphasized the critical role of probationary employees in government operations, stating that their firings could undermine public services.
Articles (19)
Center (8)
FAQ
The exact number of terminated probationary employees is not clearly stated, but it is reported to be more than 16,000 people.
The article mentions Elon Musk leading the purge through the newly created Department of Government Efficiency, but it does not specify his direct role in the firings. Instead, it highlights demands made through the Office of Personnel Management.
History
- 4M4 articles
- 4M6 articles