House Passes Bill to Limit Nationwide Injunctions Targeting Trump's Policies
The House passed the 'No Rogue Rulings Act', limiting judges' power to issue nationwide injunctions against federal policies, largely along party lines.
Overview
On Wednesday, the House passed the 'No Rogue Rulings Act' by a 219-213 vote, amid claims of judicial overreach targeting Trump's agenda. The legislation aims to restrict federal judges from issuing nationwide injunctions, allowing only localized judicial relief. Republicans argue the bill curbs ‘activist judges’ interfering with executive authority, while Democrats contend it undermines necessary judicial checks. The bill's future is uncertain in the Senate, where Democratic support is needed.
Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.
Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.
Analysis
- The House passed legislation to limit federal judges from issuing nationwide injunctions, which they argue is a response to increasing judicial actions against the Trump administration.
- Republicans claim that the judiciary is acting beyond its scope by issuing these injunctions, while Democrats counter that judges are enforcing the law against executive overreach.
- The bill aims to prevent 'judge shopping' and ensure that decisions impact only the parties involved in cases, although its future in the Senate remains uncertain.
Articles (7)
Center (3)
No highlight available for this article.
NBC News·3M·No highlight available for this article.
Associated Press·3M·No highlight available for this article.
USA TODAY·3M·FAQ
The primary purpose of the bill is to limit federal judges' power to issue nationwide injunctions, restricting them to local judicial relief unless specified otherwise, such as in class action lawsuits.
The bill passed the House with a vote of 219 to 213, primarily supported by Republicans, with all but one Republican voting in favor, and no Democrats supporting the bill.
The bill faces uncertain prospects in the Senate, where it will require support from several Democrats to meet the 60-vote threshold necessary for it to advance.
Republicans argue the bill is necessary to curb judicial overreach by 'activist judges,' while Democrats claim it undermines necessary judicial checks on executive power.
History
- This story does not have any previous versions.