Judge Declines Immediate Action on AP’s Access to White House Events
A federal judge refuses to enforce immediate compliance from the White House regarding AP's access, impacting freedoms under the First Amendment.
Overview
U.S. District Judge Trevor N. McFadden did not take immediate action on The Associated Press' request for enforcement of access rights after ruling its ban violated the First Amendment. The case revolves around the White House's conditional policy on AP coverage related to its reporting on the Gulf of Mexico. While allowing some access, concerns remain about potential viewpoint discrimination. The AP may pursue further challenges if compliance issues continue, emphasizing significant implications for press freedom.
Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.
Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.
Analysis
- The court ruling highlights significant free-speech implications related to the First Amendment, as AP's access was blocked based on editorial decisions.
- The judge is cautious in determining compliance and emphasizes the need for the government to be given the opportunity to operate in good faith regarding the new access policy.
- The gradual changes in press access may raise concerns about potential viewpoint discrimination, despite the administration's claims of neutrality.
Articles (3)
Center (2)
No highlight available for this article.
Associated Press·2M·No highlight available for this article.
Deadline·2M·FAQ
Judge McFadden ruled that the AP failed to demonstrate irreparable harm requiring an immediate restraining order, despite acknowledging potential viewpoint discrimination under the First Amendment[2].
The White House barred AP after it continued using 'Gulf of Mexico' instead of 'Gulf of America' as mandated by an executive order, citing a violation of its style policy[2].
The AP argued the exclusion constituted viewpoint discrimination violating the First Amendment, as it punished adherence to editorial standards rather than addressing legitimate security or logistical concerns[2].
Judge McFadden scheduled a March 20 hearing for further arguments but declined to issue an immediate injunction[2]. (Note: The AP later won full reinstatement in April 2025 per other sources, but this outcome isn't detailed in the current cited documents)[1].
Dozens of outlets including Fox News and Newsmax signed a letter condemning the policy as a threat to press freedom, showing rare bipartisan media solidarity[2].
History
- This story does not have any previous versions.