Supreme Court Weighs Constitutionality of Obamacare Preventive Care Mandate
The Supreme Court is divided over the Obamacare mandate for no-cost preventive health benefits, with a ruling expected by end of June.
Overview
The Supreme Court heard arguments on the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act’s requirement for preventive healthcare coverage. A group of Christian businesses argues that the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force lacks proper appointment legitimacy, as its members are not Senate-confirmed. This case affects recommendations for services like cancer screenings and HIV medications that benefit over 150 million Americans. While some justices expressed skepticism towards the challengers' claims, others appeared sympathetic. The ruling, expected by late June, could significantly impact preventive care provisions established since the ACA's inception.
Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.
Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.
Analysis
- The Supreme Court appears likely to uphold a critical preventive care provision of the Affordable Care Act, potentially impacting 150 million Americans' access to essential health services.
- Conservative justices expressed skepticism regarding the plaintiffs' claims that the task force's recommendations are unconstitutional due to the lack of Senate-confirmed appointments.
- The case may ultimately be sent back to the lower courts, but the government's arguments gained traction, suggesting the preventive services could remain protected under the ACA.
Articles (6)
Center (2)
No highlight available for this article.
ABC News·2M·No highlight available for this article.
Associated Press·2M·FAQ
The Supreme Court is considering whether the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force is constitutionally authorized to set mandatory preventive care coverage requirements, as its members are not confirmed by the Senate, raising questions about separation of powers.
The ruling could affect coverage for services such as cancer screenings, contraception, statin medications, human-papilloma-virus vaccines, and HIV-prevention drugs like PrEP, which currently benefit over 150 million Americans.
Challengers argue that the task force members are unconstitutional appointees because they are not Senate-confirmed and that their mandate violates the separation of powers by imposing binding healthcare coverage requirements without proper congressional or Senate oversight.
The Trump administration surprisingly defended the mandate's constitutionality, emphasizing the Health Secretary's control over the task force, while the Biden administration defended the law focusing on the health impacts of removing coverage requirements.
The Supreme Court is expected to issue its ruling on the constitutionality of the Obamacare preventive care mandate by the end of June.
History
- 2M
3 articles