Scientific Societies Step In to Fill Climate Report Void After Trump Administration Dismissal
Two major scientific societies will produce research documents assessing climate change's impact in response to the Trump administration's dismissal of a federal climate report.
Overview
The American Meteorological Society and the American Geophysical Union are set to produce peer-reviewed research documents on climate change after the Trump administration dismissed 400 scientists working on a vital federal report. This joint effort aims to ensure that the science continues amid concerns over the administration's re-evaluation of the National Climate Assessment, originally due out by 2027. Experts stress the need for updated data to guide adaptation and mitigation strategies, highlighting the significant impact of climate change on health, safety, and economic growth across the U.S.
Report issue
Read both sides in 5 minutes each day
Analysis
- The American Geophysical Union and American Meteorological Society are stepping in to continue essential climate research, which is threatened by the Trump administration's dismissal of scientists involved in the National Climate Assessment.
- The National Climate Assessment is crucial for projecting the long-term impacts of climate change, helping communities prepare and adapt to future environmental challenges.
- The ongoing efforts by scientific societies highlight the bipartisan importance of climate change and the necessity for reliable scientific data to inform policy, as extreme weather events affect everyone, regardless of political affiliation.
Articles (3)
FAQ
AGU and AMS will curate a special collection across over 29 peer-reviewed journals covering climate observations, projections, impacts, risks, and solutions to maintain the scientific rigor of climate assessments previously handled by the NCA.
The article describes the dismissal but does not specify the administration's reasoning. Context suggests it occurred during a broader re-evaluation of the NCA process.
The special collection does not replace the NCA but provides a peer-reviewed mechanism for ongoing climate research, while the NCA is a congressionally mandated synthesis of existing science with direct policy implications.
While specifics aren't detailed here, typical NCA priorities include extreme weather impacts, sea-level rise threats to coastal communities, and economic disruptions from climate-related disasters.
The announcement does not specify a completion date for the special collection, which appears designed as an ongoing repository rather than a single report like the NCA.
History
- This story does not have any previous versions.