Associated Press logo
CNN logo
CBS News logo
4 articles
·1M

Kilmar Abrego Garcia Alleges Vindictive Prosecution Amid Smuggling Charges and Wrongful Expulsion

Kilmar Abrego Garcia's lawyers seek dismissal of smuggling charges, alleging vindictive prosecution after his wrongful expulsion to El Salvador, violating a U.S. immigration judge's order.

Subscribe to unlock this story

We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $5/month, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!

Get Started

Have an account? Sign in

Overview

A summary of the key points of this story verified across multiple sources.

  • Kilmar Abrego Garcia faces criminal charges for allegedly transporting immigrants, including minors, who illegally crossed the U.S.-Mexico border as part of a smuggling conspiracy.
  • His legal team is seeking dismissal of these charges, asserting that the prosecution is "vindictive and selective," stemming from a 2022 traffic stop.
  • Abrego Garcia claims he was wrongfully expelled to El Salvador, a move he states violated a U.S. immigration judge's order, fueling his vindictive prosecution accusation.
  • The 2022 incident involved Abrego Garcia driving a vehicle with nine passengers, which subsequently led to the current federal smuggling charges against him.
  • His lawyers argue that the U.S. government's actions against him are a form of vindictive prosecution, impacting his ongoing legal battle and rights.
Written by AI using shared reports from
4 articles
.

Report issue

Pano Newsletter

Read both sides in 5 minutes each day

Analysis

Compare how each side frames the story — including which facts they emphasize or leave out.

Center-leaning sources frame this story by emphasizing the defense's claims of "vindictive prosecution" against Kilmar Abrego Garcia. They highlight the alleged "wrongful expulsion" and "violation" of a judge's order by the Trump administration, portraying the government's actions as potentially unlawful and retaliatory. The narrative prioritizes the defense's perspective, with minimal counter-arguments from the prosecution.

"The motion said the government also aimed to change public opinion about Abrego Garcia’s deportation."

Associated PressAssociated Press
·1M
Article

"The attorneys claimed the Trump administration is only prosecuting Abrego Garcia for alleged human smuggling crimes because he challenged his deportation to El Salvador, where he was initially held at the notorious mega-prison known as CECOT."

CBS NewsCBS News
·1M
Article

Articles (4)

Compare how different news outlets are covering this story.

FAQ

Dig deeper on this story with frequently asked questions.

Kilmar Abrego Garcia faces federal criminal charges for allegedly transporting immigrants, including minors, who illegally crossed the U.S.-Mexico border as part of a smuggling conspiracy, stemming from a 2022 traffic stop where he was driving a vehicle with nine passengers without luggage during a three-day journey from Texas to Maryland.

His legal team is seeking dismissal on the grounds of vindictive and selective prosecution, arguing that the government's actions punish him for challenging his wrongful expulsion to El Salvador, which violated a U.S. immigration judge's order protecting him.

Kilmar Abrego Garcia was wrongfully expelled to El Salvador in March 2025 by the Trump administration despite a 2019 U.S. immigration judge's order that shielded him from deportation due to likely threats of gang violence; he was imprisoned without trial in a Salvadoran maximum security center and later returned to the U.S. to face charges.

The Trump administration publicly accused him of being a member of the MS-13 gang based on a 2019 immigration court determination, which he denies and was never charged with; this allegation factored into his deportation and public narrative but is disputed in court.

History

See how this story has evolved over time.

  • This story does not have any previous versions.