Cornell Accuser Reports Death Threats

Her lawyer says threats and a swatting incident have left her terrified.

Balanced

10 left9 center22 right

Updated 8:05pm ET

Every side, every morning

A free recap of the day’s biggest stories and how each side covered them.

What happened

Cornell students and advocates staged sit-ins and rallies over the university’s handling of Jane Doe’s rape allegation, with more than 150 events expected nationwide on Oct. 8. The protests followed a lawsuit in which Doe, a former Cornell student, says seven Chi Phi fraternity members sexually assaulted her in October 2024 after she was intoxicated and pressured to take drugs; the men deny wrongdoing. Cornell’s Title IX process found students responsible and issued expulsions and suspensions, while Cornell says it investigated thoroughly and hired former federal prosecutor Sally Yates to review its handling. The reopened criminal investigation and Attorney General Letitia James’s challenged role remain unresolved.

How each side covered it

From the left

Left-leaning outlets stressed institutional failures to investigate sexual assault seriously and concern over backlash against women who report assault. The Guardian tied the Cornell case to accused men not being held to serious account despite #MeToo’s promises. Quoting the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism, HuffPost warned that right-wing voices used the case to malign women who report assault. The New York Times emphasized moral blame for degrading treatment and bystanders’ refusal to intervene, regardless of the legal consent dispute.

From the right

Right-leaning outlets stressed unresolved evidence, due-process risks, campus-safety failures, and personal-responsibility arguments. The New York Post tied Jane Doe’s earlier messages to doubts about treating her as a proven victim, while also faulting campus handling and framing discussion of risky choices as prevention rather than blame. The Daily Mail quoted Michael Tracey warning that outrage and political intervention risked prejudging the accused men before an impartial investigation.

Headlines