Justice Alito Recuses From Climate Case

What happened

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not participate in Suncor Energy Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, a major climate case set for next week. Supreme Court clerk Scott Harris told the parties in a one-sentence letter that Alito “has determined that he will not continue to participate in this case.” The case asks whether Boulder, Colorado, and its county may sue Exxon Mobil and Suncor Energy under state law for climate-change damages, or whether federal law blocks those claims. Environmental and watchdog groups had urged recusal over Alito’s energy holdings. His disclosures list ConocoPhillips, Phillips 66 and other oil and gas investments. Oral argument is set for Oct. 5.

How each side covered it

From the left

Left-leaning accounts framed the move as an ethics concession after pressure over fossil-fuel investments, with the case’s climate stakes close behind. CNN tied the step to weeks of pressure from environmental groups over whether Alito was compromised by oil and gas holdings. CNN also stressed that the outcome could shape similar damages lawsuits against fossil-fuel companies. The Daily Beast emphasized a reversal after earlier resistance.

From the right

Right-leaning accounts led with conflict concerns and outside pressure, while stressing the case as a test of climate-damages lawsuits. The Daily Mail pointed to an apparent conflict concern tied to energy holdings, while noting Alito did not own stock in the companies in the suit. The Gateway Pundit framed the dispute around whether local governments can seek climate-change damages from oil companies. The Daily Mail cast the move as abrupt.

Headlines

Justice Alito Recuses From Climate Case

What happened

How each side covered it

From the left

From the right

Headlines

Left6

Center10

Right4

Every side, every morning

Also today