Jack Smith Defends Probes

The former special counsel rejected GOP claims that his Trump probes were improper.

Balanced

39 left15 center26 right

Updated Sep 29, 9:00pm ET

Every side, every morning

A free recap of the day’s biggest stories and how each side covered them.

What happened

Former special counsel Jack Smith testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee about his investigations, which led to two federal indictments against Donald Trump. The hearing centered on subpoenas for phone toll records, which show call routing and timing, and other communications involving lawmakers and Trump allies during the Jan. 6 and election-interference probes. In prepared remarks, Smith said threats of prosecution would not silence him, defended the charges, and said the evidence showed Trump committed serious crimes. Republicans accused him of partisan abuse, while Smith and defenders said the subpoenas were routine tools needed to map the alleged conspiracy. Chair Chuck Grassley said Smith’s team obtained records involving 44 members of Congress. The Republican scrutiny is continuing, while Democrats say Smith had long offered to testify.

How each side covered it

From the left

Left-leaning accounts framed the hearing as a Republican pressure campaign that failed to discredit Smith, rather than proof of misconduct. CNN lingered on Schmitt’s basketball-game exchange as a botched gotcha that embarrassed Republicans and MAGA media. The New York Times emphasized calls to prosecute Smith, while CNN highlighted his defense of evidence-driven charges.

From the right

Right-leaning accounts framed the hearing as overdue accountability for a weaponized probe, not as a failed attack on Smith. The New York Post cast the investigation as corrupt and aimed at Trump and Republicans. Just the News stressed Smith’s defiance and his claim that the charges were independent and justified. RedState focused on donor privacy, while Fox News highlighted media communications as government overreach.

Headlines