DNC Sues Trump Administration

Democrats say taxpayer-funded ads praising Trump violate federal propaganda laws.

Balanced

2 left2 center5 right

Updated Oct 7, 11:17pm ET

Every side, every morning

A free recap of the day’s biggest stories and how each side covered them.

What happened

The Democratic National Committee sued the Trump administration in federal court, asking a judge to block taxpayer money from producing or airing the ads. Common Cause and other plaintiffs filed a separate lawsuit the same day seeking to stop federal funding for the campaign. The ads began airing in September before the midterm elections and promote President Donald Trump and his political message, making their public funding the core dispute. The DNC says the ads are partisan propaganda that could help Republicans; the administration calls them patriotic, nonpartisan public-service announcements. The campaign has cost more than $12 million to run. A government-paid ad still aired Tuesday after Trump pledged future ads would use super PAC money.

How each side covered it

From the left

Left-leaning outlets framed the dispute around taxpayer-funded ads that elevate Trump’s election-season message, with more stress on backlash than budget authority. HuffPost described the spots as glorifying Trump and said they drew bipartisan backlash. The Boston Globe highlighted the DNC’s claim that the ads were illegal government propaganda and noted the continued government-paid airing after Trump’s funding pledge.

From the right

Right-leaning outlets focused on Democrats’ legal theory and the administration’s defense of its spending power, rather than dwelling on backlash. Newsmax emphasized the lawsuit’s claim that appropriated money was used for banned “publicity or propaganda”. Just the News foregrounded Trump’s argument that the ads promoted the United States and that future spots would use private or super PAC funds.

Headlines