Supreme Court Reviews Home Distilling Ban

The justices will consider whether Congress can ban distilling spirits at home.

Center & Right

4 left10 center7 right

Updated Oct 19, 2:01pm ET

Both sides, every morning

The day’s biggest stories and how each side covered them. Free.

What happened

The Supreme Court agreed to review Department of Justice v. McNutt, a challenge to the federal ban on distilling spirits at home. The justices took the Justice Department’s appeal of a Fifth Circuit ruling that struck the ban down. The ban dates to 1868, when Congress acted amid evasion of federal spirits taxes. The Sixth Circuit upheld the ban in another case. The government says home stills are hard to inspect and can aid tax evasion. The challengers say Congress cannot criminalize home distilling for that reason. Arguments are expected next year; the case asks whether Congress may use its taxing power to prohibit home conduct.

How each side covered it

From the left

Left-leaning outlets framed the case as a hobbyist-risk story, a tax-power test, and a revenue-defense fight. CNN stressed that the ban turns home distilling into a serious criminal risk for enthusiasts extending brewing skills to spirits. The Boston Globe quoted plaintiffs challenging the prohibition on home distilling calling the 1868 law an “antiquated relic,” and government attorneys warning that lifting the ban would erode congressional powers.

From the right

Right-leaning outlets framed the case as a federal overreach question, with personal liberty outweighing administrative concerns. The Washington Examiner emphasized whether the government had overstepped its powers by criminalizing home distilling. One America News Network cited government attorneys saying the restriction prevents evasion of federal excise taxes. RedState cast reconsideration of the old ban as welcome news for alcohol lovers and personal freedom.

Headlines

  1. 1117articles
  2. 249articles
  3. 348articles
  4. 443articles
  5. 531articles
  6. 628articles