Eagles Face Backlash Over Jalen Hurts

The Eagles face criticism over Jalen Hurts' blood clot care, though the NFL found no wrongdoing.

Left & Center

6 left8 center1 right

Updated Oct 20, 8:44pm ET

Both sides, every morning

The day’s biggest stories and how each side covered them. Free.

What happened

The NFL concluded it would not discipline the Philadelphia Eagles over their handling of quarterback Jalen Hurts’s blood-clot condition. Hurts was diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis in his left leg and pulmonary emboli in both lungs, and the team said he would miss the rest of the season. The condition followed a superficial clot found in his calf before Philadelphia’s Oct. 11 game against Jacksonville in London. Blood clots in deep veins can move to the lungs, while blood thinners raise bleeding risks in contact football. The Eagles said doctors cleared Hurts to play. The league said it was in contact with Eagles doctors and the Cleveland Clinic in London. Hurts’s agent and the team said they expect a full recovery.

How each side covered it

From the left

Left-leaning outlets framed the case as a player-safety and worker-protection failure, with the stakes extending beyond football. The Guardian said praise for Hurts’s toughness obscured an episode that put him in real danger and demanded accountability. The Nation cast his treatment as part of a wider culture that treats athletes and other workers as expendable. HuffPost treated the diagnosis as a public-health warning that dangerous clots can strike younger, seemingly healthy people too.

From the right

Only one right-leaning outlet we track covered this: FOX News, under the headline “NFL clears Philadelphia Eagles of wrongdoing in handling of Jalen Hurts blood clot situation”.

Headlines

  1. 1102articles
  2. 258articles
  3. 358articles
  4. 449articles
  5. 544articles
  6. 637articles