Martin Shkreli Faces Contempt Bid

Regulators say Shkreli violated a lifetime ban from the pharmaceutical industry.

Balanced

3 left8 center3 right

Updated Oct 13, 6:48pm ET

Every side, every morning

A free recap of the day’s biggest stories and how each side covered them.

What happened

The FTC and attorneys general from seven states asked a federal judge to hold Martin Shkreli in civil contempt. They allege he repeatedly violated his lifetime ban from the pharmaceutical industry after his May 2022 prison release. The ban followed a court finding that Shkreli helped block generic competition for Daraprim, whose price rose from $17.50 to $750 per tablet. The court also ordered him to pay $64.6 million. The injunction bars him from owning pharmaceutical stakes or influencing company decisions. Shkreli called the action an assault on his First Amendment rights. Regulators want stock divestment, profit-based fines, and escalating penalties. The judge has not ruled.

How each side covered it

From the left

Left-leaning outlets framed the case as alleged defiance of a lifetime industry ban and another chapter in the familiar Pharma Bro story. The Guardian reported that the FTC and seven US states alleged Shkreli repeatedly violated the ban and should face contempt sanctions. CNN connected the renewed legal trouble to his notoriety, earlier drug-price profiteering and imprisonment.

From the right

Right-leaning outlets emphasized enforcement of a lifetime ban, with sharper focus on accountability and Shkreli’s public posture. Epoch Times cast the ban as a consequence of a scheme that kept cheaper Daraprim rivals off the market. The New York Post highlighted regulators’ portrayal of Shkreli as flaunting market bets despite the court order.

Headlines

  1. 188articles
  2. 264articles
  3. 358articles
  4. 443articles
  5. 539articles
  6. 638articles