Lindsay Clancy Mistrial Spurs Juror Dispute
Jurors described tense deliberations after Lindsay Clancy's trial ended in mistrial.
4 left5 center5 right
Updated Sep 8, 8:53pm ETEvery side, every morning
A free recap of the day’s biggest stories and how each side covered them.
The reporting
Three jurors in Lindsay Clancy’s Massachusetts triple-murder trial said the panel was split 11-1 for acquittal by lack of criminal responsibility, and that the lone holdout said he had reasonable doubt but would not vote to acquit. Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial on September 4 after more than six days of deliberations. Clancy is charged with killing her three children in January 2023. Defense lawyer Kevin Reddington said he hopes to reach an agreement with prosecutors after the mistrial.
Analysis & opinion
Juror conduct condemnedMostly Right
The jurors who attacked the lone holdout acted unfairly and shamefully. Their public disparagement of the dissenting juror was improper, especially given the gravity of the case.
Excusing child killingMostly Right
Lindsay Clancy’s possible acquittal reflects a disturbing willingness to excuse the killing of children when the accused mother is viewed sympathetically. Treating her claimed mental illness as a reason to celebrate acquittal reveals a serious moral failure.
Also today
All of today's stories →- 1Balanced64articles
- 2Balanced42articles
- 3Balanced38articles
- 4Riyadh Airport Attack Kills 12Left & CenterLeft & Center36articles
- 5Balanced34articles
- 6Balanced32articles