Lindsay Clancy Jurors Explain Mistrial
Jurors said one holdout blocked a verdict in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial.
1 left2 center9 right
Updated Sep 9, 8:19pm ETEvery side, every morning
A free recap of the day’s biggest stories and how each side covered them.
The reporting
Jurors in Lindsay Clancy’s Massachusetts murder trial said the panel deadlocked 11-1 before the judge declared a mistrial, with the majority prepared not to convict her in the 2023 deaths of her three children. Three female jurors, including the foreperson, said the lone holdout would not move from a vote to convict. Juror Nick Dargie separately said the holdout did not cite a “single piece of evidence” to explain his position. Clancy’s defense centered on insanity, while prosecutors charged her with first-degree murder.
Analysis & opinion
Holdout Was RightMostly Right
The jurors pushing for acquittal let sympathy, emotion, and personal views overwhelm the legal question before them. The lone holdout was justified in refusing a not-guilty verdict because Lindsay Clancy killed her three children and that fact could not be minimized.
Also today
All of today's stories →- 1Balanced100articles
- 2Katie Zacharia Holds First Press BriefingMostly LeftMostly Left100articles
- 3Donald Trump Attacks Ilhan OmarMostly RightMostly Right80articles
- 4Balanced59articles
- 5Pope Leo XIV Has Lung CancerBalancedBalanced50articles
- 6Trump Russian Diesel Deal Draws FireLeft & CenterLeft & Center47articles

