Cornell Faculty Move Toward No-Confidence Vote

The Faculty Senate advances a no-confidence resolution as protests intensify.

Balanced

4 left6 center8 right

Updated 11:26am ET

Every side, every morning

A free recap of the day’s biggest stories and how each side covered them.

What happened

Cornell faculty senators introduced a no-confidence resolution criticizing the administration’s handling of the sexual-assault crisis, with a vote set for October 14. Cornell police had drafted letters to Verizon and T-Mobile asking them to preserve phone-account data for the investigation, but it is unknown whether they were sent or pursued. A former student identified as Jane Doe alleges seven Chi Phi fraternity members sexually assaulted her while she was impaired; the men deny wrongdoing, with some calling the activity consensual and others denying involvement. Hundreds have protested, while Cornell President Michael Kotlikoff said the university is not hiding anything. The state review and local criminal investigation remain ongoing.

How each side covered it

From the left

Left-leaning outlets framed the vote push as a campus confidence crisis, emphasizing pressure on Cornell leaders rather than doubts about the underlying allegation. CNN highlighted no-confidence votes as a formal sign that a group has lost faith in leadership. The Daily Beast focused on Megyn Kelly’s comments as a personal attack on the alleged victim. The Boston Globe tied Cornell to broader university leadership failures.

From the right

Right-leaning outlets framed Cornell as facing an accountability crisis, while giving more space to political and evidentiary skepticism. The Daily Mail emphasized accusations that Cornell’s leadership mishandled the investigation. Fox News focused on partisan backlash over efforts to connect the episode to Trump. The Federalist stressed doubts about consent, intoxication and credibility in Doe’s account.

Headlines