32

Articles

28

Sources

16%

Analysis & opinion

The reporting

A neutral summary of the key facts most outlets agree on, drawn from reporting across the political spectrum.

The Justice Department asked the Supreme Court on Thursday to lift U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani’s temporary order blocking parts of a U.S. Postal Service mail-ballot rule for November’s midterm elections. Solicitor General D. John Sauer said the Boston order interferes with President Donald Trump’s March executive order directing USPS procedures for mail ballots. The rule would require states to send mail-voter lists to USPS and allow the agency to withhold or refuse delivery of ballots to recipients not on those lists, as ballots were set to begin going out.

Analysis & opinion

The arguments that emerged from this coverage — built only from the analysis and opinion pieces, never from straight reporting. Each dot is one article, placed by its outlet's bias — left to right. How to read our graphics →
angles sorted left-argued → right-argued

USPS ballot failuresLeans Left

Putting USPS in a new gatekeeping role over mail ballots would endanger the election. The system is not ready and could wrongly block or mishandle large numbers of valid ballots.

Democracy Now!

Improper ballot restrictionsLeans Left

The administration’s mail-ballot crackdown goes beyond what the government can properly do. Restricting access to mail voting or letting USPS reject ballots is legally suspect and threatens voters’ rights.

AlterNet
Raw Story

Deliberate election sabotageLeans Left

Trump is intentionally manipulating mail-in voting to make elections less fair. His actions are aimed at suppressing Democratic votes and creating chaos that weakens confidence in the midterms.

AlterNet
Slate

Get tomorrow's edition

Every side, every morning — free in your inbox.

More of today's stories

all of today's stories →