Susan Collins Probe Controversysince Sep 22

Trump Halted Sen. Collins Probe

A report says Trump intervened in an FBI probe of Sen. Collins over a donor-linked defense deal.

12

Articles

12

Sources

Reporting: 6 articles (50%)Analysis: 1 articles (8%)Opinion: 5 articles (42%)

Coverage mix

What happened

The facts the coverage agrees on, drawn from reporting across the political spectrum. Where the sides dispute something, it's attributed.

ProPublica reported the FBI’s anti-corruption investigation was expanding into Sen. Susan Collins and others. It said the probe was effectively killed or stalled after President Trump returned and the bureau team was dismantled. In 2019, as Collins faced a hard reelection fight, super PAC chief Scott Reed met Navatek executives and asked for a $500,000 donation. Navatek executives allegedly tied any gift to help securing tens of millions in federal funding and Maine contracts. CEO Martin Kao later sent $150,000 through a shell company. Prosecutors indicted Kao in 2022 over illegal contributions; no Collins worker was charged. The FBI said it found nothing implicating Collins or her campaign, and Collins’s office denied the allegations. Whether the broader inquiry proceeds remains unresolved.

Both sides

How left-leaning and right-leaning outlets told this story, in their own coverage. Outlet names link to the article we drew from.

From the left

The left framed the story as alleged pay-to-play, with contractor donations traded for Collins-linked political support and defense funding. AlterNet cast it as a Trump-era intervention that saved Collins from a wider FBI corruption inquiry. AlterNet also lingered on the alleged shell-company route as a way to hide contractor money and evade campaign-finance law.

From the right

Right-leaning outlets we track didn't cover this story.

Coverage6 articles 6 left, 0 center, 0 right

Get tomorrow's edition

Every side, every morning — free in your inbox.

More of today's stories

all of today's stories →