9

Articles

9

Sources

Reporting: 5 articles (56%)Opinion: 4 articles (44%)

Coverage mix

What happened

The facts the coverage agrees on, drawn from reporting across the political spectrum. Where the sides dispute something, it's attributed.

Sen. Susan Collins denied ProPublica’s report that the FBI investigated whether she was tied to an alleged pay-to-play scheme involving Navatek campaign donations and defense contracts. ProPublica said indicted Navatek CEO Martin Kao later cooperated with investigators, which helped broaden the inquiry. The report landed during Collins’s competitive Maine reelection race, about six weeks before Election Day, with Senate control at stake. Collins called the story “absolutely outrageous” and a “political hit job.” Her campaign and FBI spokesperson Ben Williamson said the matter was investigated years ago and resolved in 2021. Maine Democrats demanded answers. The unresolved issue is whether a 2024 FBI inquiry existed and was later shut down.

Both sides

How left-leaning and right-leaning outlets told this story, in their own coverage. Outlet names link to the article we drew from.

From the left

Left-leaning accounts treated the allegations as either a major public-corruption case or a warning about weakened enforcement under Trump. Democracy Now! framed Collins as steering military money to Navatek. Techdirt cast the inquiry’s collapse as tied to Trump’s return. Raw Story highlighted Collins calling it a partisan hit job, while MEDIAite doubted ProPublica’s substance.

From the right

Only one right-leaning outlet we track covered this: FOX News, under the headline “Susan Collins tears into bribery allegations as new claims emerge during critical Senate battle”.

Coverage9 articles 6 left, 2 center, 1 right

Get tomorrow's edition

Every side, every morning — free in your inbox.

More of today's stories

all of today's stories →