New Hampshire Student ID Ban Allowed

What happened

The Supreme Court granted New Hampshire’s emergency request to pause a lower court order, letting the state bar student IDs even as backup proof when voters seek ballots in November. A federal judge had left the law in place but blocked state guidance that stopped officials from weighing student IDs under a safety-valve process. New Hampshire’s 2026 law removed student IDs from the accepted photo IDs for ballots while keeping that backup process. State officials said student IDs cannot be considered there, while the Coalition for Open Democracy said they can be weighed with other evidence. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented. The lawsuit remains unresolved after the midterms.

How each side covered it

From the left

Left-leaning outlets framed the order as a Republican-backed win for tighter ID rules, while stressing the court’s timing rationale and Jackson’s objection. CNN emphasized that the decision benefited New Hampshire Secretary of State David Scanlan and the Republican National Committee, while tying it to Election Day timing. Raw Story focused on the view that the lower court was correcting misleading guidance, not rewriting election rules.

From the right

Right-leaning outlets framed the ruling as a defense of limits on late election changes, with election security as the core reason. Washington Examiner highlighted the court’s view that a lower federal judge should not block the policy shortly before voting. The Federalist cast the student ID dispute as closing an election-integrity loophole. Epoch Times presented the result as New Hampshire Republicans prevailing before the midterms.

New Hampshire Student ID Ban Allowed

What happened

How each side covered it

From the left

From the right

Both sides, every morning

Headlines

Left6

Center7

Right5

Also today