Alaska Election Lawsuit Draws Backlash

Peltola, Murkowski and legal experts criticize DOJ's bid to block Alaska results if Sullivan loses.

55% left, 31% center, 14% right

Mostly Left

· 28 outlets

Summary

Updated 8:21pm ET

The Justice Department sued Alaska election officials to block certification of the Senate result if Republican Sen. Dan S. Sullivan loses and would have won had votes for Daniel J. Sullivan gone to him. The department says Daniel J. Sullivan entered the race to confuse voters and divert votes from the incumbent. President Trump said he personally directed the lawsuit. The race includes Democratic candidate Mary Peltola and Daniel J. Sullivan, a retired teacher, and could affect Senate control. Alaska uses ranked-choice voting, where voters can rank both Sullivans, and the ballot labels the incumbent as a Republican. Peltola, Sen. Lisa Murkowski, Democratic groups, voting-rights groups and voters opposed the case. The case remained pending.

Left and right

From the left

Left-leaning outlets framed the case as an attempt to shape the result before voters finish choosing, stressing the risk to voter power. Vox cast Trump as trying to overturn an election before it happens. The New York Times emphasized doubts about legal authority and the ballot’s existing safeguards. HuffPost highlighted Mary Peltola’s charge that the move was desperate and distracting.

From the right

Right-leaning outlets framed the dispute as a ballot-integrity fight against a same-name candidacy they said could mislead Republican voters. Breitbart News described Daniel J. Sullivan as a decoy being aided by Democrats to siphon support from the incumbent. The Gateway Pundit leaned on the Justice Department’s warning that confusion could distort the winner.

Both sides, every morning

The day’s biggest stories and how each side covered them. Free.

Articles