NFL Seeks Prediction Markets Ruling

The league asks justices to decide who regulates prediction markets: states or the feds.

Mostly Center

0 left10 center5 right

Updated Oct 8, 5:45pm ET

Every side, every morning

A free recap of the day’s biggest stories and how each side covered them.

What happened

The NFL filed a Supreme Court brief supporting New Jersey’s request for a ruling on who may regulate sports-related prediction markets. The case pits operators such as Kalshi, which call event contracts federally regulated financial products, against states that call sports contracts gambling under state law. Appeals courts have split, with the Third Circuit backing Kalshi and the Ninth Circuit backing Nevada regulators. The NFL says state oversight is needed to protect consumers and game integrity, while Kalshi says the CFTC is policing the markets. NFL-related trading topped $1.8 billion on the season’s first Sunday. The Supreme Court has not agreed to hear the dispute.

How each side covered it

From the left

Left-leaning outlets we track didn't cover this story.

From the right

Right-leaning outlets framed the dispute as prediction markets testing whether federal exchange status can sidestep state gambling rules. Daily Caller cited the NFL’s view that such markets are sportsbooks under another label. Daily Mail emphasized the league’s warning that lighter CFTC oversight leaves consumers exposed and could invite cheating.

Headlines

  1. 188articles
  2. 264articles
  3. 358articles
  4. 443articles
  5. 539articles
  6. 638articles