Pano News
Subscribe

Saturday, October 24th

The Pano newsletter, as it was sent that morning.

Most covered

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

    Israel Closes West Bank

    Balanced32 articles
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9

    Iran War Sends Oil Higher

    Balanced26 articles
  10. 10

    Paris Gunman Kills One

    Mostly Right20 articles

Also today: Supreme Court Allows NH Student-ID BanCharlie Kirk Trial Delay SoughtTrump Eases Canada TariffsApple Launches Foldable iPhone DuoJordan Church Attack Kills 7

In depth

TRUMP MIDTERM CAMPAIGN

DOJ Sues To Block Alaska Certification

DOJ seeks to halt Senate certification if votes for another Sullivan could cost the GOP incumbent.

Leans Left69 articles

What happened

The Justice Department sued Alaska and state election officials, asking a federal court to block certification of the U.S. Senate race under specified circumstances. Alaska officials had tried to exclude Daniel J. Sullivan, but state courts allowed him to remain on the ballot. The race pits Republican Sen. Dan S. Sullivan against Democrat Mary Peltola and Daniel J. Sullivan under ranked-choice voting, where voters can rank multiple candidates. The DOJ says the second Sullivan could confuse voters and distort the result. Daniel J. Sullivan says he ran independently and denies trying to confuse voters or coordinating with Peltola. Trump said he directed the lawsuit. The court’s decision remained pending.

From the left

Left-leaning outlets framed the case as a partisan federal move, with less focus on voter confusion than on power and legal reach. CNN portrayed the Justice Department as serving Trump’s political interests rather than neutral law enforcement. The New York Times cast the suit as part of a wider push to control midterm outcomes and questioned its legal basis.

From the right

Right-leaning outlets framed the case around ballot integrity, while stressing a possible spoiler effect and the unusual timing. The Washington Examiner emphasized the Justice Department’s concern that voters’ intentions could be misread. Breitbart portrayed the second Sullivan as a Democratic-backed spoiler meant to siphon votes. The Daily Mail focused on the pre-election federal intervention.

Read the full story →

RAMASWAMY ACTON AD FIGHT

Donald Trump Defends Vivek Ramaswamy Ad

Trump backed Ramaswamy’s contested Ohio attack ad as Republicans urged its removal.

Mostly Left70 articles

What happened

President Donald Trump defended Republican Ohio gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy’s ad featuring Democratic rival Amy Acton’s estranged mother, Donna Arthur, and urged him to keep it running. The campaign has said it will spend $4 million promoting the ad, which calls Acton a liar and says voters should not elect her. Acton has said her stepfather sexually abused her as a child, was indicted in 1978, pleaded not guilty and fled before trial. She says her mother stayed with him and has not seen her since she was 12. Ramaswamy said the ad targets Acton’s honesty, not childhood abuse. The campaign says it will continue airing the ad.

From the left

Left-leaning outlets framed the ad as a moral breach, focusing on the use of a childhood abuse allegation rather than campaign hardball. CNN described it as an attempt to weaponize alleged child sexual abuse against Acton. The New York Times cast Trump and Vance’s defense as a test of Republican limits in the Trump era. Daily Beast leaned on warnings that the attack could hurt Ramaswamy near Election Day.

From the right

Right-leaning outlets split between defending the ad as fair politics and treating it as a risky personal escalation. The Blaze emphasized Trump’s support and argued the pressure to pull the ad reflected media double standards. Washington Examiner lingered on how the race had turned deeply personal, with Republican criticism showing the backlash crossed party lines. Fox News cited Mehek Cooke saying Acton’s record, not the ad, should be scrutinized.

Read the full story →

ILHAN OMAR INVESTIGATION

Donald Trump Urges Ilhan Omar’s Resignation

Trump called for Omar to resign or be removed after prosecutors used another name in a court filing.

Mostly Right64 articles

What happened

President Donald Trump demanded Rep. Ilhan Omar resign, claiming she used a fake name to enter Congress. Omar remains in office, and Trump has no authority to remove her from her House seat. Federal agents searched Omar’s Washington home on Oct. 12 under a warrant in a criminal investigation into possible fraud in her family’s immigration paperwork. Omar, who came from Somalia as a child in 1995 and became a U.S. citizen in 2000, has denied wrongdoing. Investigators are examining whether false details appeared in immigration documents; earlier federal reviewers closed a 2019 review for insufficient evidence. U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro said another name in a court filing was Omar’s real name; Omar’s office called that false. No charges have been announced.

From the left

Left-leaning outlets cast Trump’s demand as an escalation of a political campaign against a Black, Muslim critic, not a neutral fraud inquiry. MS NOW framed the probe as abuse of power and said Republican leaders should defend Omar’s rights as a lawmaker. Al Jazeera stressed that the unexplained name did not prove fraud or justify forcing Omar from Congress.

From the right

Right-leaning outlets treated the disputed name as the center of a possible identity and immigration fraud scandal, emphasizing consequences for Omar’s citizenship and seat. Fox News framed Omar as deflecting valid scrutiny through persecution claims while allies shielded her from accountability. The New York Post lingered on family-name matches, a reported marriage certificate and her father’s background as reasons suspicions persist.

Read the full story →

You're reading the web version of the Pano newsletter sent Saturday, October 24th. All editions